June 22, 1984
It is vital,
then, that any therapist convinces the client that while the superbeing is a
self-construction, and/or that the voices are hallucinations – this does not
mean that the client is insane.
An effort should
be made to help the client understand that errors of thought and belief
are responsible for the condition – and that the removal of those erroneous
beliefs can relieve the situation. The
therapist should make it clear that he understands that the client is not lying,
in ordinary terms, when he reports hearing voices from the devil.
According to the
particular case in point, the therapist should then try to point out the errors
of thought and belief involved, and also to explain their more or less habitual
cast.
First, the ideas
must be disentangled, and then the habitual behavior will begin to
disintegrate. The therapist should also
assure the client that on many subjects and topics of thought and conversation,
the client operates quite well. The
subject itself is so vast that, of course, an entire book could easily be
devoted to it, so it is impossible to cover all the issues that may be involved
with such cases here.
Some of the
errors concern the misinterpretation of physical events. The individual – convinced he or she is being
pursued by some secretive organization – again, may hear the sirens on a very
real police car. The error is the
assumption that the vehicle is pursuing the individual rather than some other
party. The therapist can help the client
learn to question his or her personal interpretation of such events.
All such cases
can have their own peculiar complications.
In the case of secondary personalities, the main operating portion who
usually directs activity might be male, displaying all of the usual male
characteristics. The secondary
personality may seemingly be female, however, even speaking in a feminine-like
voice. Or the opposite might be the
case.
It is also
possible for the individual to dress in male attire, while the secondary
personality wears feminine clothes – or vice-versa.
What we are
involved in mainly, however, are the characteristic periods of seeming amnesia,
occurring usually involuntarily, often without any transition except perhaps
for a headache.
In this
category, I am not referring to individuals like Ruburt, who speak for another
personality with a sense of ease and tranquility, and whose resulting
information is excellent knowledge – the obvious products of uncommon sense
that proves to be helpful to the individual and others.
Behind all of
those instances we have been discussing, however, there is again the need for
value fulfillment, that has been blocked largely by conflicting or even
opposing beliefs.
Regardless of
how unbelievable it might seem to some readers, it is true that even the most
destructive events are based upon misinterpretations of reality, opposing
beliefs, and the inability to receive or express love. In fact, that kind of rage is the mark of a
perfectionist caught in what seems to be the grasp of a world not only
imperfect, but evil.
This brings us
to another most dangerous belief – that the end justifies the means.
The greatest
majority of destructive acts are committed in line with that belief. It leads to a disciplined over rigidity that
gradually cuts down the range of human expression.
You should be
able to see, in fact, that the problems we have been discussing begin by
limiting the field of available choices, and thus curtailing the range of expression. The individual will try to express himself or
herself to the best degree possible, and so each individual then begins a
concerted effort to seek out those avenues of expression still open. All of the constructive beliefs mentioned
throughout this book should be applied to all of the instances in this
chapter. The individual must feel safe
and protected enough to seek its own development and aid in the fulfillment of others.
No comments:
Post a Comment