Nature of the Psyche, Chapter 2: Your Dreaming Psyche Is Awake
You have hypnotized yourselves so that it
seems to you that there are great divisions between your waking and your
sleeping experience. Yet each of you
will fall asleep tonight, and you will have experiences that you forget only
because you have been told that you cannot remember them. Many of the other dimensions of your own
reality appear clearly when you are sleeping, however. When you sleep, you forget all definitions
that you have placed upon yourself and your own existence through
training. In sleep you use images and
languages in their pure form.
In the dream state, languages and images
are wedded in a way that seems alien only because you have forgotten their
great alliance. Initially, language was
meant to express and release, not to define and limit. So when you dream, images and language merge
often, so that each becomes an expression of the other and each fulfills the
other. The inner connections between
each are practically used.
When you awaken, you try to squeeze the
psyche’s language into terms of definition.
You imagine that language and images are two different things, so you
try to “put them together”. In dreams,
however, you use the true ancient language of your being.
Session 756
Your “dreaming” psyche seems to be dreaming
only because you do not recognize that particular state of awareness as your
own. The “dreaming” psyche is actually
as awake as you are in your normal waking life.
The organization of wakefulness is different, however. You come into dreaming from a different
angle, so to speak.
The “off-center” quality sensed in dream
activity, the different viewpoints, the perspective alterations, all can add to
a chaotic picture when the dream state is viewed from the waking one.
Centuries ago, in your terms, words and
images had a closer relationship – now, somewhat tarnished – and this older
relationship appears in the dream fabric.
We will use English here as an example.
The great descriptive nature of names, for instance, can give you an
indication of the unity of image and word as they appeared in your dreams. Once, a man who tailored clothes was named
“Tailor”. A man who was a robber was
called “Robber”. If you were the son of
a man with a certain name, then “son of” was simply added, so you had
“Robberson”. Each reader can think of
many such examples.
Now, names are not as descriptive. You may have a dream, however, in which you
see a tailor’s shop. The tailor may be
dancing or dying or getting married.
Later, in waking life, you may discover that a friend of yours, a Mr.
Taylor, has a party, or dies, or gets married, whatever the case may be; yet
you might never connect the dream with the later event because you did not
understand the way that words and images can be united in your dreams.
Your waking life is the result of the most
precise kind of organization, held competently and with amazing clarity. While each person views that reality from a
slightly different focus, still it occurs within certain ranges or
frequencies. You bring it into clear
focus in almost the same way that you adjust your television picture, only in
this case not only sound and images are synchronized, but phenomena of far
greater complexity. Following this analogy,
everyone sees a slightly different picture of reality, and follows his or her
own program – yet all of the “sets” are the same.
When you dream, however, you are to some
extent experiencing reality from a different “set” entirely. Now, when you try to adjust your dreaming set
in the same way that you would the waking one, you end up with static and
blurred images. The set itself, however,
is quite as effective as the one you use when you are awake, and it has a far
greater range. It can bring in many
programs. When you watch your ordinary
television program, perhaps on a Saturday afternoon, you view the program as an
observer. Let me give you an example.
Ruburt and Joseph often watch old Star Trek reruns as they eat their
evening meal. They sit quite comfortably
on their living room couch, with dinner on the coffee table, surrounded by all
of the dear, homey paraphernalia that is familiar to your society.
As they sit thus comfortably ensconced,
they observe dramas in which planets explode, and otherworld intelligences rise
to challenge or to help the dauntless captain of the good ship Enterprise and
the fearless “Spock” – but none of this threatens our friends, Ruburt and
Joseph. They drink their coffee and eat
their dessert.
Now: Your normal waking reality can be
compared to a kind of television drama in which you participate directly in all
of the dramas presented. You create them
to begin with. You form your private and
joint adventures, and bring them into experience by using your physical
apparatus – your body – in a particular way, tuned in to a large programming
area in which, however, there are many different stations. In your terms, these stations come
alive. You are the drama that you
experience, and all of your activities seem to revolve about you. You are also the perceiver.
In the dream state, it is as if you have a
still-different television set that is, however, connected with your own. Using it, you can perceive events not only
from your own viewpoint, but from other focuses. Using that set, you can leap from station to
station, so to speak – not simply perceiving, but experiencing what is
happening in other times and places.
Events, then, are organized in a different
fashion. Not only can you experience
dramas in which you are intimately involved, as in waking life, but your range
of activities is multiplied so that you can view events “from outside” your own
usual context. You can look down at a
drama on the one hand, for example, and participate in it as well.
When you are dealing with normal waking
reality, you are operating at one level of the many that are native to your
psyche. When you are dreaming, from your
viewpoint you are entering other levels of reality quite as native to your
psyche, but usually you are still experiencing those events through your
current “waking station”. The dreams
that you remember are colored or altered or even censored to a certain extent. There is no inherent psychological or
biological necessity for this. Your ideas
and beliefs, however, about the nature of reality, and sanity, have
resulted in such a schism.
Let us return to our friends, Ruburt and
Joseph, watching Star Trek as each of
you watch your favorite programs.
Ruburt and Joseph know that Star Trek is not “real”. Planets can explode on the television screen,
and Ruburt will not spill one drop of coffee.
The cozy living room is quite safe from the imaginary catastrophes that
are occurring just a few feet from the couch.
Yet in a way the program reflects certain beliefs of your society in
general, and so it is like a specialized mass waking dream – real but not real. For a moment, though, let us change the
program to your favorite cops-and-robbers show.
A woman is shot down in the street.
Now this drama becomes “more real”, more immediately probable, less
comfortable. So watching such a program,
you may feel slightly threatened yourself, yet still largely unconcerned.
Some of my friends may not watch such
programs at all, but instead look at wholesome sagas, or religious dramas. A preacher may stand golden-faced,
earnest-eyed, extolling the merits of goodness and damning the legions of the
devil – and to some of my readers that devil, unseen, never appearing, may
nevertheless seem quite real.
You form certain focuses, then. You will blithely ignore certain televised
dangers as sheer good adventure, while others may strike you to the heart as
“too real”. So in your waking and
dreaming experiences, you will make the same kind of distinctions. You will be touched by or untouched by waking
or dreaming events according to the significance you place upon them.
If you do not like a television program,
you can switch to another with a mere flick of the wrist. If you do not like your own physical
experience, you can also change to another, more beneficial station – but only
if you recognize the fact that you are the producer.
In the dream state, many people have
learned to escape from a bad dream by waking up, or altering the focus of
consciousness. Ruburt and Joseph do not
feel threatened, again, by Star Trek. The program does not make them feel less
safe. When you are in the middle of a
frightening physical experience, however, or caught in the throes of a
nightmare, then you wish you knew how to “change the station”.
You can often get carried away by a
television drama, so that for a moment you forget that it is “not real”, and in
your concentration upon it you can momentarily ignore the greater reality about
you.
Sometimes you are deliciously frightened by
a horror program, for example. You may
feel compelled to see how it comes out, and find yourself unable to go to bed
until the horrendous situation is resolved.
All the time you know that salvation is nearby: You can always switch
off the program. If someone watching a
gory midnight special suddenly screams or shouts or leaps up from the chair,
how comical this seems, because the action is appropriate not to the “real”
situation, but geared instead to a pseudo drama. The yelling and screaming will have
absolutely no effect upon the program’s actors, and will alter the drama not
one whit. The appropriate action would
be turn the station off.
In this case, the frightened perceiver
knows full well that the terrible events on the screen will not suddenly
explode into the living room. When you
become caught in frightening physical events, however, it is equally foolhardy
to yell or shout or stamp your feet, because that is not where the action is. Again, you have only to change your
station. But often you become so
engrossed in your life situation that you do not realize the inappropriateness
of your response.
In this case you are yourself the
programmer, and the true action is not where it appears to be – in the exterior
events – but instead in the psyche, where you are writing and performing the
drama. In the dream state, you are
writing and performing many such dramas.
No comments:
Post a Comment