Session Seven: The Intellect as a Cultural Artifact. Creating One’s Own Experience
August 28, 1980
The intellect is far more socially oriented
than is generally understood.
Some of this, again, is difficult to
explain, but in a fashion the intellect is a cultural phenomenon. It is amazingly resilient, in that according
to the belief structures of any given historical period, it can orient itself
along the lines of those beliefs, using all of its reasoning abilities to bring
such a world picture into focus, collecting data that agree, and rejecting what
does not.
Obviously, the mind can use its reasoning
abilities, for example, to come to the conclusion that there is a single god
behind the functioning of the world, that there are many gods, that divinity is
a fantasy, and that the world itself spring from no reasonable
source. Like statistics, the reasoning
abilities can be used to come to almost any conclusion. This is done, again, by taking into
consideration within any given system of reasoning only the evidence that
agrees with the system’s premises.
This flexibility allows the species great
variation overall in its psychological and cultural and political and religious
activities. When any system of reasoning
becomes too rigid, however, there are always adjustments made that allow other
information to intrude – otherwise, of course, your belief systems never
change.
Your species shares with the other species
a feeling of kinship for its kind. There
is a great give-and-take of ideas. You
end up, then, with a consensus, generally speaking, as to what a reasonable
picture of agreed-upon reality is. Your
system has frowned upon many experiences, considering them eccentric behavior
in an adverse fashion, since your belief systems have so regimented behavior,
and so narrowly defined sanity. The
intellect, I want to stress, is socially oriented. It is peculiarly suited, of course, to react
to cultural information. It wants to see
the world as it is seen by the minds of others.
Through that kind of action, it helps form your cultural environment,
the civilization of which you are justly proud.
The intellect, then, helps your species
translate its own natural purposes and intents – the purposes and intents of
the natural person – into their “proper” cultural context, so that those
abilities the natural person possesses can benefit the civilization of its
time. Those purposes and intents
literally change the world. The
intellect’s expectations and intents spontaneously and automatically trigger
the proper bodily mechanisms to bring about the necessary environmental
interactions, and your intent as expressed through your intellect directs your
experience of the world.
I am speaking about the intellect here for
our discussion, but remember it is everywhere cushioned also. There are backup systems, in other
words. If the intellect believes that
the world is a threat to existence, then that belief will alter its intents, of
course, and therefore the body’s activities.
The beliefs of the intellect operate then as powerful suggestions,
particularly when the intellect identifies with those beliefs, so that
there is little distance between the intellect and the beliefs that it holds as
true.
I am doing my best to explain the very
practical aspects of the intellect’s beliefs, and their strength in drawing
experience to you. At one time, you both
had difficulty with understanding some of these ideas. Your own relationship, your private beliefs
about the sort of persons you wanted individually for mates, brought about
incalculable actions that led finally to your meeting – yet it all happened
“quite naturally”, of course. Your
beliefs bring you into correspondence with the elements likely to lead
to their affirmation. They draw from
Framework 2 all of the necessary ingredients.
They elicit from other people behavior that is in keeping with those beliefs.
Your own attitudes, for example – and
beliefs – about foreigners, Prentice-Hall, people’s stupidity and lack of
integrity, put you in correspondence with those same beliefs on the part of
others, resulting in the translation fiasco.
An entirely different kind of behavior could have been elicited from
those same people. Like attracts like in
that regard. Those same people, for
example, all have, as you do, beliefs in people’s trustworthiness, and so forth
– but under those conditions, at that time, you each – or rather, you all –
were in correspondence at many levels.
The books were published. They
have helped many people, and that is because you were also in correspondence as
far as many of your more positive beliefs are concerned, and those did outweigh
the others.
You get what you concentrate upon, and your
beliefs are largely responsible for those areas in which you concentrate.
There are no magical methods, only natural
ones that you use all of the time, although in some cases you use them for
beliefs that you take for truths, when instead they are quite defective
assumptions. A small example – one,
incidentally, that Ruburt finally realized; but it is a beautiful instance of
natural methods. He used it beautifully,
even though the results were not pleasing at first. It also shows Ruburt’s growing understanding.
He heard tomorrow’s weather report (yesterday), groaned, thought of a very
uncomfortable 90-degree temperature tomorrow [and] imagined himself miserable
with the heat. Indeed, he began to feel
warmer. In a flash, he remembered
previous days of discomfort, and in the next moment he projected those into the
weekend. He felt trapped. Midway through this process he tried to catch
himself, but he believed that his body could not handle the heat – and that
belief outweighed his intent to change his thoughts, so they kept returning for
perhaps ten minutes.
He continued, however, to remind himself
that he was not going to worry about tomorrow today, regardless. He told himself that the prediction might be
wrong, and he began with his intellect to pile up evidence that could in one
way or another bring about a different, more beneficial experience. He did this by recognizing the way he had
earlier been building up the picture in the old manner, by collecting all the
evidence that fitted it. He used the
same process, only for a more beneficial picture, and the process works. You have only to become aware of it.
Your experience will follow your
concentration and belief and expectation.
The mind is a great discriminator.
It can use its reasoning to bring about almost any possible experience
within your framework.
Now” Ruburt’s body is definitely recovering
normal motion. Laying down is excellent.
The additional moving about, however, from
one place to another, is most beneficial. The sensations in his buttock of heat, even burning
at times, and in the legs and feet, all represent additional motion and beneficial
activity. Sometimes at night the activity
might make him feel uncomfortable, but the body is activating itself in certain
ways while it is supported.
Have him write a poem a day, and do an ink sketch.
The thought came to him. It is a good one, while mind and body both relax.
I think that your painting of the dog is excellent.
I am not an artist, but I know what I like as
much as anyone else does.
These changes in Ruburt’s body are as magical
as any precognitive dream in that regard.
No comments:
Post a Comment