Love and fear in duality
DeMarco, Frank. Rita's World: A View from the Non-Physical
(Kindle Location 3680). Rainbow Ridge Books. Kindle Edition
(Q) "3D is not
really a duality but instead a continuum in which we look at both ends of one
stick. Is this true of love and fear as
well?"
(A) The short answer
is "yes", and for once there are not caveats or cross-currents to
look at. Although people talk about
living in pure love, entirely banishing fear, that is more an ideal to be lived
toward than a goal that can actually be reached. This, despite what people claim. If you are living in a world of duality, what
makes you think you can station yourself on the extreme end of the spectrum and
not participate in the other end, or rather, in gradations?
No reincarnation?
(Q) "In one
sense, there is no reincarnation.
Neither Rita, Frank, nor Charles will return other than as a strand in a
new entity or soul. Is this
correct?"
(A) Again, yes. In this case, we need remind you that the
question as posed says "in one sense". Look at it another way and it looks quite
different. This, though, not for today,
because we are not going to do a full session, or anything like it. Just make a note that the question could be
considered in more detail and from different starting places.
Memory
(Q) "Andrew
Bartzis says Earth is a 100 percent free will and no memory planet. No memory presumably means we do not recall
the strands and bundles that comprise us.
While in 3D wouldn't it make life easier if we could relate to the
strands composing us?"
(A) Remember, the
fact that someone says something, even if with great certainty, has nothing to do with whether the statement
is accurate. Your own experiences, and
those of so many TMI participants (that is, people whose firsthand testimony
can weigh), tells you otherwise. If it
is a "no memory planet", how did the field of past-life review and
NDE experiencer and psychic communication across time and space come to
be? And as to 100 percent free well,
that is true in a certain sense of
the words. From any given moment of time
(which, of course, is always experienced as "the present"), your free
will is at least theoretically large.
However, it is hardly unlimited!
Everything that came before that moment could be regarded as a limiting
factor. This statement is at best
somewhat true, but not very.
The demonstration of the fact that it is not very true is
that, in fact, you can relate to the strands composing you. It is a skill that can be learned, which
means it is not closed off.
Is 3D functioning correctly?
(Q) "Why was the
3D world created? Is it working as it
was planned? If not, is it possible to
change the direction and get it back to its original formation?"
(A) This one makes me
smile. Do clouds work the way they were
planned? Do the elements of any system
you can name work the way they were planned?
And if they did not, would 3D individuals, even working in close harmony
with their non-3D components, know what to do to bring things back to balance?
... Save this one for another day.
No comments:
Post a Comment