Thursday, March 29, 2018

A few short questions to Rita

Love and fear in duality


DeMarco, Frank. Rita's World: A View from the Non-Physical (Kindle Location 3680). Rainbow Ridge Books. Kindle Edition

(Q)  "3D is not really a duality but instead a continuum in which we look at both ends of one stick.  Is this true of love and fear as well?"

(A)  The short answer is "yes", and for once there are not caveats or cross-currents to look at.  Although people talk about living in pure love, entirely banishing fear, that is more an ideal to be lived toward than a goal that can actually be reached.  This, despite what people claim.  If you are living in a world of duality, what makes you think you can station yourself on the extreme end of the spectrum and not participate in the other end, or rather, in gradations?

No reincarnation?


(Q)  "In one sense, there is no reincarnation.  Neither Rita, Frank, nor Charles will return other than as a strand in a new entity or soul.  Is this correct?"

(A)  Again, yes.  In this case, we need remind you that the question as posed says "in one sense".  Look at it another way and it looks quite different.  This, though, not for today, because we are not going to do a full session, or anything like it.  Just make a note that the question could be considered in more detail and from different starting places.

Memory


(Q)  "Andrew Bartzis says Earth is a 100 percent free will and no memory planet.  No memory presumably means we do not recall the strands and bundles that comprise us.  While in 3D wouldn't it make life easier if we could relate to the strands composing us?"

(A)  Remember, the fact that someone says something, even if with great certainty, has nothing to do with whether the statement is accurate.  Your own experiences, and those of so many TMI participants (that is, people whose firsthand testimony can weigh), tells you otherwise.  If it is a "no memory planet", how did the field of past-life review and NDE experiencer and psychic communication across time and space come to be?  And as to 100 percent free well, that is true in a certain sense of the words.  From any given moment of time (which, of course, is always experienced as "the present"), your free will is at least theoretically large.  However, it is hardly unlimited!  Everything that came before that moment could be regarded as a limiting factor.  This statement is at best somewhat true, but not very.

The demonstration of the fact that it is not very true is that, in fact, you can relate to the strands composing you.  It is a skill that can be learned, which means it is not closed off.

Is 3D functioning correctly?


(Q)  "Why was the 3D world created?  Is it working as it was planned?  If not, is it possible to change the direction and get it back to its original formation?"

(A)  This one makes me smile.  Do clouds work the way they were planned?  Do the elements of any system you can name work the way they were planned?  And if they did not, would 3D individuals, even working in close harmony with their non-3D components, know what to do to bring things back to balance?

... Save this one for another day.


No comments:

Post a Comment