Mass Events, Session 815
Ruburt and Joseph
have recently purchased a color television set, so now their television world
is no longer in black and white. I have
used television as an analogy at various times, and I would like to do so
again, to show the ways in which physical events are formed, and to try to
describe the many methods used by individuals in choosing those particular
events that will be personally encountered.
Not only does
television actually serve as a mass means of communal meditation, but it also
presents you with highly detailed, manufactured dreams, in which each viewer
shares to some extent. We will use some
distinctions here, and so I am going to introduce the terms “Framework 1” and “Framework
2” to make my discussion clear.
We will call the
world as you physically experience it, Framework 1. In Framework 1, you watch television
programs, for example. You have your
choice of many channels. You have
favorite programs. You follow certain
scenes or actors. You watch all of these
dramas, hardly understanding how it is that they appear on your screen to begin
with. You are certain, however, that if
you do buy a television set it will perform in an adequate fashion, whether or
not you are familiar with electronics.
You switch from
channel to channel with predictable results.
The programming for Channel 9, for example, does not suddenly intrude on
Channel 6. Even the actors themselves,
taking part in such sagas, have not the remotest idea of events that are
involved in order that their own images will appear on your television
screen. Their jobs are to act, taking it
for granted that the technicians are following through.
Now somewhere
there is a program director, who must take care of the entire programming. Shows must be done on time, actors assigned
their roles. Our hypothetical director
will know which actors are free, which actors prefer character roles, which
ones are heroes or heroines, and which smiling Don Juan always gets the girl –
and in general who plays the good guys and the bad guys.
There is no need
in my outlining in detail the multitudinous events that must occur so that you
can watch your favorite program. You
flip the switch and there it is, while all of that background work is unknown
to you. You take it for granted. Your job is simply to choose the programs of
your choice on any evening. Many others
are watching the same programs, of course, yet each person will react quite
individually.
Now for a moment
let us imagine that physical events occur in the same fashion – that you choose
those which flash upon the screen of your experience. You are quite familiar with the events of
your own life, for you are of course your own main hero or heroine, villain or
victim, or whatever. As you do not know
what happens in the television studio before you observe a program, however, so
you do not know what happens in the creative framework of reality before you
experience physical events. We will call
that vast “unconscious” mental and universal studio Framework 2.
In this book I
will try to tell you what goes on behind the scenes – to show you the ways in
which you choose your daily physical programs, and to describe how those
personal choices mix and merge to form a mass reality. For now, we will go back to television
again. You can turn off a program that
offends you. You can choose to buy or
not buy a product whose virtues are being praised. Television presents you with a mirror of your
society. It reflects and re-reflects
through millions of homes the giant dreams and fears, the hopes and terrors of
events in the most private individual.
Television
interacts with your lives, but it does not cause your lives. It does not cause the events that it depicts. With your great belief in technology, it
often seems to many people that television causes violence, for example, or
that it causes a love of over-materialism, or that it causes “loose
morals”. Television reflects. In a manner of speaking it does not even
distort, though it may reflect distortions.
The writers and actors of television dramas are attuned to the “mass
mind”. They are not leaders or
followers. They are creative reflectors,
acutely aware of the overall, generalized emotional and psychic patterns of the
age.
They also make
choices as to which plays they will take part in. [Each has his or her] own favorite kind of
role, even if the role be that of a maverick.
To the actors, of course, their roles become strong parts of their
personal experiences, while those who observe the plays take part largely as
observers.
You are aware
through your newspapers and magazines of the dramas, news broadcasts, or other
programs that are presently being offered.
In the same way you are aware, generally speaking, of the “programs”
being physically presented in your own nation and throughout the world. You decide which of these adventures you want
to take part in – and those you will experience in normal life, or in Framework
1.
The inner
mechanisms that happen prior to your experience will take place in the vast
mental studio of Framework 2. There,
all the details will be arranged, the seemingly chance encounters, for example,
the unexplained coincidences that might have to occur before a given physical
event takes place.
On a conscious
level, and with your conscious reserves alone, you could not keep your body
alive an hour. You would not know how to
do it, for your life flows through you automatically and spontaneously. You take the details for granted – the breathing,
the inner mechanisms of nourishment and elimination, the circulation, and the
maintenance of your psychological continuity.
All of that is taken care of for you in what I have termed as Framework
2.
In that regard,
certainly, everything works to your advantage.
Indeed, often the more concerned you become with your body the less
smoothly it functions. In the
spontaneity of your body’s operation there is obviously a fine sense of
order. When you turn on a television set
the picture seems to come out of nowhere onto the screen – yet that picture is
the result of order precisely focused.
Actors visit
casting agencies so that they know what plays need their services. In your dreams you visit “casting agencies”. You are aware of the various plays being
considered for physical production. In
the dream state, then, often you familiarize yourself with dramas that are of a
probable nature. If enough interest is
show, if enough actors apply, if enough resources are accumulated, the play
will go on. When you are in other than
your normally conscious state, you visit the creative inner agency in which all
physical productions must have their beginning.
You meet with others, who for their own reasons are interested in the
same kind of drama. Following our
analogy, the technicians, the actors, the writers all assemble – only in this
case the result will be a live event rather than a televised one. There are disaster films being planned,
educational programs, religious dramas.
All of these will be encountered in full-blown physical reality.
Such events occur
as a result of individual beliefs, desires, and intents. No death occurs by chance, nor any
birth. In the creative atmosphere of
Framework 2, intents are known. In a
manner of speaking, no act is private.
Your communication systems bring to your living room notices of events
that occur throughout the world. Yet
that larger inner system of communications is far more powerful in scope, and
each mental act is imprinted in the multidimensional screen of Framework
2. That screen is available to all, and
in other levels of consciousness, particularly in the sleep and dreaming
stages, the events of that inner reality are as ever-present and easily accessible
as physical events are when you are awake.
It is as if
Framework 2 contains an infinite information service, that instantly puts you
in contact with whatever knowledge you require, that sets up circuits between
you and others, that computes probabilities with blinding speed. Not with the impersonality of a computer, however,
but with a loving intent that has your best purposes in mind – yours and also
those of each other individual.
You cannot gain
what you want at someone else’s detriment, then. You cannot use Framework 2 to force an event
upon another person. Certain
prerequisites must be met, you see, before a desired end can become physically
experienced.
No comments:
Post a Comment