Seth Early Sessions, Vol 6, Session 249
Perception of Action
I want to stress some points mentioned in
our last session, to the effect in particular that you perceive only a small
portion of any given action even when the action has some of its origins
within your own physical field.
You perceive portions of such actions
consciously, some subconsciously, some with the inner senses, but you do not
perceive the whole action. Your perceptions,
your physical perceptions, cut a good bit of the portion that you perceive into
bits and pieces. Since you do not
perceive whole action that occurs within your own system, you do not understand
it. So it should not surprise you that
you misinterpret projections of other actions from different systems,
when they appear as they sometimes do within your own.
When actions from other systems are projected
into your own, your own perceptions distort the true nature of the event. To begin with then, you attempt to understand
an action that is poorly perceived. You
project upon it your own concepts of space and time, and try to interpret the
action in their light.
Quasars
This is certainly the case with
quasars. Until an intuitive insight
strikes, the quasars will not be understood.
Now.
They represent energy in a much more pure form than any with which you
are acquainted in your system.
This does not necessarily mean that such energy as that displayed
by the quasars does not exist within your system. We shall discuss that later. But you are not acquainted with the
existence of such energy.
Now.
Looking from your planet, outward as you think, at the quasars, your
scientists believe that they look backward in space, in your terms. This is erroneous. It is true enough within the present
framework of your knowledge, and the idea will work in the same way that the
cause and effect theory works, which is only up to a certain point.
The idea will seem legitimate, and then
suddenly it will fall apart. It will
fall apart for a very simple reason, and for a more profound one.
The simple reason, so simple that it
appears childlike, is this. If
you can look backward from your planetary viewpoint with your physical
instruments, and using your own terms and definitions, then from some point you
see within the same framework, your scientists should be able to look
forward, and they cannot.
That is the simple reason. The profound reason is as simple to say, but
more difficult to understand. Using your
terms again, and your scientific framework, when you look outward away from your
planet, and when you assume that you are looking backward in time, you are simply
looking into, or toward, what my be described for analogy’s sake, the center,
or core, of an infinite sphere; which exists, you see, in your terms as far on
the other side of the inner core, and in all directions. You cannot look away from it, for you
are not on any outward edge or skin of it, from which to get such a viewpoint.
And time does not exist as a past,
present and future in your terms. We
will here get rather complicated, I’m afraid.
Even in our discussions we use the terms
past, present and future, but I have told you that your future can influence
your past, and that the spacious present is the only time reality.
We will say what we have to say, and
then clarify for you later as we go along.
Now. To look backward into the
past, speaking on my terms now and not yours, to look backward into the past
entails looking forward into the future, and there is no firm ground,
you see; there is no present in a basic manner, no firm ground
that is the present, from which to view the future or the past. For they are all one, and you are part
of the spacious present.
Let it be understood that for simplicity’s
sake we have been dealing with analogies that can be understood by you. The fact is you see that we are speaking in
terms of simplified dimensions, and of physical properties.
Now the quasars represent pure energy,
basically speaking. Your scientists
presently have little idea of what this means, for comparatively speaking they
conceive of energy in one-dimensional terms.
You know what antimatter is. You
know what positive matter is. Both of
these represent realities that you can understand rather easily.
(For
some material on antimatter in particular see the 60-63rd sessions.)
They deal with the manipulation of atoms
and molecules. With our quasars we are
dealing with something else. We are
dealing with energy that has no need of atoms and molecules, and no need of
chemical reactions. We are dealing with
energy that is instantly transformed into action without matter.
It is electrical energy. Quasars are distributed, so to speak,
throughout all realities – throughout all universes, in other words. They do not conform to the camouflage
patterns within any system outside of their own. They are not suns, planets, galaxies or
universes in those terms.
Their electrical intensity and mass cannot
be explained by your physics.
Their influence is felt in every
universe. Their diffused, or their
energy diffused through all systems, powers all systems.
There is no intelligent life within them in
your terms. They are composed of
endless intelligence. They are not
matter, but in your terms they have been matter.
They will not be explained by your science
in anything like adequate terms. They
represent what you would call an evolution of energy, so far advanced as to be
unrecognizable as life to you.
It is their energy that gives energy
to your own, and all other universes, and it is their energy that forms the
matter of your own physical universe.
Yet these quasars represent the power of only a small portion of
reality.
The trouble here is that even in our
discussions we are to some extent limited by your own concepts, for you do not
have words to express what I could say, you see.
I hope to be able to introduce concepts to
Ruburt, but intuitively. These will then
become also a property of his intellect, and help us put the words together
that we need.
The complexity is literally too much for
language. These quasars were not
discovered earlier because your astronomers would not see them. That they see them now is a direct result of
enlarged concept patterns on their part.
What the “see” is of course distorted. What they see has no physical mass however,
but only electrical mass and intensity, which is a different thing.
Now, even the home skies about you are filled
with other realities, as I have said often. You will perceive the existence of these realities
with various instruments in the future, but only their existence. You will not perceive their nature.
No comments:
Post a Comment