Seth Early Sessions, Vol 6, Session 244
Indeed, Ruburt was correct before our
sessions. He said that I might speak
about dream locations, since he has been working on this subject for his own
book.
He wants to know in what dimension dream
locations have their reality, and indeed he has considered all of the
possibilities save the correct one. The
correct one is the most simple one.
Now.
He has taken if for granted that dream locations do not exist within
physical space.
Dream locations exist in so-called physical
space as truly, or as falsely, as physical objects exist in physical
space. As you should know by now,
physical objects are only the result of your own perception, and this
perception is based upon your psychological makeup, your physical structure,
certain combinations of nerves and chemical reactions. As any physicist will tell you, you
perceive objects, and you perceive solid objects in a dimension where neither solidity
nor objects exist. You perceive certain
patterns of energy as solid objects, and that energy which you do not
perceive as solid, you call space.
Because of other procedures which I have
explained, including the existence of constant telepathy, there is some
agreement as to the placement of these objects, or if Ruburt prefers,
locations, in space. Now this gives rise
to what you may call mass-perception.
When you are dealing with dream locations you
are not dealing with mass-perceptions, but with personal perceptions. There is no need therefore for any
complicated arrangements calculated to insure agreement between persons as to
locations in space.
(Seth
has dealt with the problem of mass-perception in the sessions on the creation
of matter: 60-73, among others. See Volume 2.)
Each dream location is created by the
individual precisely in the same way that I explained to you; that is, they do
not differ basically from physical locations, but in one degree. The difference is mainly that they need not
be perceived by others.
The question however, in what dimensions do
dream locations exist, was simply based.
Nevertheless it is one that has many implications, for which you need
more background. I will attempt a
simplified explanation then. Do you
remember some of the material that I gave concerning the expanding universe?
(“Yes.”
(See
sessions 42-45. But as early as the 15th
session Seth was discussing these problems as related to dreams. All in Volume 1.)
I said then that the universe expands in
a way that has nothing to do with space.
Now. A dream location exists,
contracts or expands also in a way that has nothing to do with space as
you understand it.
Now.
I wish to congratulate Ruburt.
There is a rather important section in the
work he did today. He hit upon
something, and if he had continued working, then he would not have needed to
ask me in what dimension dream locations exist.
He was close to the answer. In
this particular section he told the reader that he suspected that Freud’s
terms, the ego, or the conscious and the subconscious, had in themselves led
you seriously astray. Such is indeed the
case.
For you see, you think that you are only
conscious when you are focused in physical reality. You assume yourselves unconscious while you
are sleeping. In Freud’s terminology,
the dice are indeed loaded, on the side of the conscious mind.
Pretend, all
of you for a moment, that you are looking at this situation from the other side. Pretend that while you are in the dream
state, you are concerned with the problem of consciousness and existence. From that viewpoint the picture is
entirely different, for you are indeed conscious while you sleep.
The locations that you visit while dreaming
are as real to you then as physical locations are to you in your waking state.
What you have is this. Let us speak no more of a conscious self and
a subconscious or unconscious self.
There is one self, and it focuses its consciousness in various
dimensions, and that is all.
In the waking state the whole self is
focused toward physical reality. In the
dreaming state the whole self is focused within a different dimension. It is every bit as conscious and aware.
Now.
If you have little memory of your dream locations while you are in the
waking state, then remember you have as little memory of waking locations when
you are in the dream state. Both
are legitimate, and both are realities.
For Ruburt then: When the physical body
lies in bed, the physical body is separated by a vast distance from the dream
location in which the dreaming self may dwell.
But this distance, dear friends, has nothing to do with space. For the dream location exists
simultaneously with the room in which the body dwells.
The dream locations are not superimposed
upon the chest and bed and chair. They
exist composed of the very atoms and molecules that in the waking state you
perceive as bed and chest and chair.
In the first place, the chest and bed and
chair are only the results of your perception, and of your physical
perception. From the energy you form
patterns which you recognize, and give names to and use, but the utility of
these objects is useless to you unless you are focused within the dimension
for which they were specifically formed.
When, in the dream state, you are focused
in a different dimension, then you see you form from the same atoms and
molecules the environment in which you will operate. Yet while you dream you cannot find the bed
nor chest nor chair, and when you wake you cannot find the room or city or
location which was there moments before.
It cannot be too strongly stressed that
these dream locations are actualities.
But as a rule they are personal actualities, without a general
mass framework. However mass dreams
do occur. There are dreams that you
share with others. There are dream environments
that you share, as you share your physical environment. These are not as limiting however as that framework
that holds together your physical reality. Nevertheless it does exist.
No comments:
Post a Comment