dreams, evolution, value fulfillment: Session 901
At the time of
this awakening man did experience, then, some sense of separation from his
dream body, and from his own inner reality – the world of his dreams – but he was
still far more aware of that subjective existence than you are now.
The practical
nature of his own dreams was also more apparent, for again, his dreams sent him
precise visions as to where food might be located, for example, and for some
centuries there were human migrations of a kind that now you see the geese
make. All of those journeys followed
literal paths that were given as information in the dream state. [But] more and more man began to identify
himself with his exterior environment.
He began to think of his inner ego almost as if it were a stranger
to himself. It became his version of the
soul, and there seemed to be a duality – a self who acted in the physical
universe, and a separate spirit-like soul that acted in an immaterial world.
This early man
(and early woman) regarded the snake as the most sacred and basic, most
secretive and most knowledgeable of all creatures. In that early experience it seemed, surely,
that the snake was a living portion of the earth, rising from the bowels of the
earth, rising from the hidden source of all earth gods. Men watched snakes emerge from their holes
with wonder. The snake was then – in
your terms, now – both a feminine and masculine symbol. It seemed to come from the womb of the earth,
and to possess the earth’s secret wisdom.
Yet also, in its extended form particularly, it was the symbol of the
penis. It was important also in that it
shed its skin, as man innately knew he shed his own bodies.
All units of
consciousness, whatever their degree, possess purpose and intent. They are endowed with the desire for
creativity, and to increase the quality of existence.
They have the
capacity to respond to multitudinous cues. There is a great elasticity for action and
mobility, so that, for example, in man his conscious experience can actually be
put together in an almost limitless number of ways.
The inner and
outer egos do not have a cementlike relationship, but can interrelate with each
other in almost infinite fashions, still preserving the reality of physical
experience, but varying the accents upon it by the inner areas of subjective
life. Even the bare-seeming facts of
history are experienced far differently according to the symbolic content
within which they are inevitably immersed.
A war, in your terms, can be practically experienced as a murderous
disaster, a triumph of savagery – or as a sublime victory of the human spirit
over evil.
We will return
to the subject of war later on. I want
to mention here, however, that man is not basically endowed with “warlike
characteristics”. He does not naturally
murder. He does not naturally seek to
destroy his own life or [the lives of] others.
There is no battle for survival – but while you project such an
idea upon natural reality, then you will read nature, and your own experience
with it, in that fashion.
Man does have an
instinct and a desire to live, and he has an instinct and a desire to die. The same applies to other creatures. In his life [each] man is embarked upon a
cooperative venture with his own species, and with the other species, and dying
he also in that regard acts in a cooperative manner, returning his physical
substance to the earth. Physically
speaking, man’s “purpose” is to help enrich the quality of existence in
all of its dimensions. Spiritually
speaking, his “purpose” is to understand the qualities of love and creativity,
to intellectually and psychically understand the sources of his being, and to
lovingly create other dimensions of reality of which he is presently unaware. In this thinking, in the quality of his
thoughts, in their motion, he is indeed experimenting with a unique and a new
kind of reality, forming other subjective worlds which will in their turn grow
into consciousness and song, which will in their turn flower from a dream
dimension into other ones. Man is
learning to create new worlds. In order
to do so he has taken on many challenges.
You all have
physical parents. Some of you have
physical children as well – but you will all “one day” also be the mental
parents of dream children who also waken in a new world, and look about
them for the first time, feeling isolated and frightened and triumphant all at
once. All worlds have an inner
beginning. All of your dreams somewhere
waken, but when they do they waken with the desire for creativity themselves,
and they are born of an innocent new intent.
That which is in harmony with the universe, with All That Is, has a
natural inborn impetus that will dissolve all impediments. It is easier, therefore, for nature to
flourish than not.
You are aware of
such activities now as automatic speaking and automatic writing, and of
sleepwalking. These all give signs in
modern times of some very important evidence of man’s early relationship with
the world and with himself.
Sleepwalking was
once, in that beginning, a very common experience – far more so than now – in
which the inner self actually taught the physical body to walk, and hence
prevented the newly emerged physically oriented intellect from getting in its
own way, asking too many questions that might otherwise impede the body’s
smooth spontaneous motion.
In the same
fashion man is born with an inbuilt propensity for language, and for the
communication of symbols through pictures and writing. He spoke first in an automatic fashion that
began in his dreams. In a fashion,
you could almost say that he used language before he consciously understood
it. It is not just that he learned by
doing, but that the doing did the teaching.
Again, lest there be a sharply inquiring intellect, wondering overmuch
about how the words were formed or what motions were necessary, his drawing was
in the same way automatic. You might say
– almost – that he used the language “despite himself”. Therefore, it possessed an almost magical
quality, and the “word” was seen as coming directly from God.
No comments:
Post a Comment