Chapter 7: The Psyche, Languages, and Gods
Session 779
Almost any
question that you can ask about God, with a capital, can be legitimately asked
of the psyche as well. It seems to you
that you know yourself, but that you take the existence of your psyche on
faith. At best, it often seems that you
are all that you know of your psyche, and you will complain that you do not
know yourself to begin with. When you
say: “I want to find myself”, you usually take it for granted that there is a
completed, done, finished version of yourself that you have mislaid
somewhere. When you think of finding
God, you often think in the same terms.
Now you are
“around yourself” all of the time. You
are ever becoming yourself. In a
manner of speaking you are “composed” of those patterns of yourself that are
everywhere coming together. You cannot
help but be yourself. Biologically,
mentally, and spiritually you are marked as apart from all others, and no cloak
of conventionality can ever hide that unutterable uniqueness. You cannot help but be yourself, then.
In a way,
physically you ae a molecular language that communicates to others, but a
language with its own peculiarities, as if speaking an accepted tongue you
spoke with a biological accent that carried its own flavor and meaning.
When you ask:
“What is my psyche, or my soul, or who am I?” you are seeking of course for
your own meaning as apart from what you already know about yourself. In that context, God is as known and as
unknown as you are to yourself. Both God
and the psyche are constantly expanding – unutterable, and always becoming.
You will
question, most likely, “Becoming what?” for to you it usually seems that all
motion tends toward a state of completion of one kind or another. You think, therefore, in terms of becoming
perfect, or becoming free. The word “becoming”
by itself seems to leave you up in the air, so to speak, suspended without
definitions. If I say: “You are becoming
what you already are”, then my remark sounds meaningless, for if you already are,
how can you become what is already accomplished? In larger terms, however, what you are is
always vaster than your knowledge of yourself, for in physical life you cannot
keep up with your own psychological and psychic activity.
Again, in a way
your bodies speak a biological language, but in those terms you are bilingual,
to say the least. You deal with certain
kinds of organizations. They can be
equated with biological verbs, adjectives, and nouns. These result in certain time sequences that
can be compared to sentences, written and read from one side, say, to the
other.
Pretend that
your life’s experience is a page of a book that you write, read, and experience
from top to bottom, left to right, sentence by sentence, paragraph by paragraph. That is the you that you know – the world
view that you understand. But other
quite as legitimate “yous” may write, read, and experience the same page
backwards, or read each letter downward and back up again, as you would a
column of figures. Or others might mix
and match the letters in entirely different fashions altogether, forming
entirely different sentences. Still
another, vaster you might be aware of all of the different methods of
experiencing that particular page, which is your life as you understand it.
You think that
your own consciousness is the only logical culmination of your body’s
reality. You read yourself in a certain
accepted fashion. In the “entire book of
life”, however, just physically speaking, there are interrelationships on
adjacent levels that you do not perceive, as other portions of your own
biological consciousness or biological language relate to the entire living
fabric of the world. In physical terms
you are alive because of substructures – psychic, spiritual, and biological –
of which you have hardly any comprehension at all.
These are
implied, however, in the nature of your own consciousness, which could not
exist otherwise as you know it. As
language gains and attains its meaning not only by what is included in it, but
also by what is excluded, so your consciousness attains its stability
also by exclusions.
What you are is implied
in the nature of what you are not. By
the same token, you are what you are because of the existence of what you are
not.
You read
yourselves from the top of the page to the bottom, or from what you think of as
the beginning to the end. Your greater
reality, however, is read in terms of intensities, so that the psyche puts you
together in a different way. The psyche
does not mark time. To it the intense
experiences of your life exist simultaneously.
In your terms they would be the psyche’s present. The psyche deals with probable events, however,
so some events – perhaps some that you dreamed of but did not materialize – are
quite real to the psyche. They are far
more real to it than most innocuous but definite physical events, as for
example yesterday morning’s breakfast.
The inner events
of the psyche compose the greater experience from which physical events
arrive. They cast an aura that almost magically
makes your life your own. Even if two
people encountered precisely the same events in their lives at precisely the same
time, their experiences of reality would still hardly be approximately
connected.
Again, you read
your own identities in a particular, specialized fashion.
Within your biological
experience, however, plant, mineral, animal, and human consciousness
intersect. They encounter each
other. In the language of the self that
you speak, these encounters are like the implied pauses in your verbal
language. These other kinds of
consciousness then form inner rhythms upon which you superimpose your own.
These encounters
of consciousness go on constantly. They
form their own kind of adjacent identities.
You would call them subspecies of consciousness, perhaps, but they are
really identities that operate in a trans-species fashion.
If you “read
yourselves” sideways in such a manner, you would discover portions of your own
consciousness stretching out across the entire fabric of the earth as you
understand it – becoming a part of the earth’s material, even as those
materials become part of the self that you recognize. Your consciousness would be far less hemmed
in. Time would expand adjacently. You think of yourselves physically as “top
dogs”, however, separate from the other species and kinds of life, so that in
effect you limit your own experience of your psyche.
If you thought
or felt in such a fashion, then you would appreciate the fact that biologically
your body is yours by virtue of the mineral, plant and animal life from which
it gains its sustenance. You would not
feel imprisoned as you often do within one corporal form, for you would
understand that the body itself maintains its relative stability because of its
constant give-and-take with the materials of the earth that are themselves
possessed of consciousness.
You could to
some extent feel your body coming together and dispersing constantly, and
understand how you hover within it without fearing your own annihilation upon
its dismantlement.
When you ask: “Who
am I?” you are trying to read yourself as if you were a simple sentence already
written. Instead, you write yourself as
you go along. The sentence that you
recognize is only one of many probable variations. You and no other choose which experiences you
want to actualize. You do this as spontaneously
as you speak words. You take it for
granted that a sentence begun will be finished.
You are in the midst of speaking yourself. The speaking, which is your life, seems to
happen by itself, since you are not aware of keeping yourself alive. Your heart beats whether or not you
understand anatomy.
You read
yourself in too-narrow terms. Much of
the pain connected with serious illness and death results because you have no
faith in your own continuing reality.
You fight pain because you have not learned to transcend it, or rather
to use it. You do not trust the natural
consciousness of the body, so that when its end nears – and such an end is
inevitable – you do not trust the signals that the body gives, that are meant
to free you.
Certain kinds of
pain automatically eject consciousness from the body. Such pain cannot be verbalized, for it is a
mixture of pain and pleasure, a tearing free, and it automatically brings about
an almost exhilarating release of consciousness. Such pain is also very brief. Under your present system, however, drugs are
usually administered, in which case pain is somewhat minimized, but prolonged –
not triggering the natural release mechanisms.
If you read your
selves adjacently, you would build up confidence in the body, and in those
cooperative consciousnesses that form it.
You would have an intimate awareness of the body’s healing processes
also. You would not fear death as
annihilation, and would feel your own consciousness gently disentangle itself
from those others that so graciously couched it.
No comments:
Post a Comment