Session 725

Unknown Reality, Session 725

This book is concerned with the nature of the unknown reality, and the ways in which it can become known.

In this section, therefore, I have outlined various experiments or exercises for the reader.  These will certainly lead you to form your own versions of the exercises given, or will open your mind so that spontaneously, in your own way, you become aware of events that were literally invisible to you before.

You may find some of your most cherished conceptions to be misconceptions in the light of your new experiences.  Since explorations are highly personal, you will most likely begin them from the framework of your current beliefs.  Symbols may be utilized and these may change their meaning for you as you progress.  The symbols may evolve, therefore.  In the beginning of this work I “warned” the reader that here in these sessions we would go beyond ideas of one god and one self.  I stated that your ideas of personhood would be expanded.  As “Unknown” Reality is being produced Ruburt and Joseph are having their own experiences, and uncovering the nature of the unknown reality as it applies to them.

Joseph recently had an experience that disturbed him, simply because it was difficult to interpret even in the light of his understanding about the nature of the self.  You cannot explore the nature of reality, hoping to discover its unknown aspects, if you insist that those aspects correspond with the known ones.  So Joseph allowed himself some freedom – and then was almost scandalized with the results.

His experience appeared to imply that his father’s identity had so much mobility, and so many possibilities for development, that the very idea of identity seemed to lose its boundaries.

First of all, in your terms “pure” identity has no form.  You speak of one self within one body because you are only familiar with one portion of yourself.  You suppose that all personhood in one way or another must have an equivalent of a human form, spiritual or otherwise, to “inhabit”.

Identity itself is composed of pure energy.  It takes up no space.  It takes up no time.  I said that there are invisible particles that can appear in more than one place simultaneously.  So can identity.  Atoms and molecules build blocks of matter, in your terms, even while the atoms and molecules remain separate.  The table between Joseph and myself does not feel invaded by the invisible particles that compose it.  For that matter, if you will forgive me for that old pun, the atoms and molecules that form the table today did not have anything to do with the table five years ago – though the table appeared the same then as now.

In the same way, quite separate identities can merge with others in a give-and-take gestalt, in which the overall intent is as clear as the shape of the table.  To some extent Joseph was perceiving that kind of inner psychic organization.

In your terms the earth at any given time represents the most exquisite physical, spiritual, and psychic cooperation, in which all consciousnesses are related and contribute to the overall reality.  Physically, this is somewhat understood.

It is difficult to explain on spiritual and psychic levels without speaking in terms of gradations of identity, for example, but in your terms even the smallest “particle” of identity is inviolate.  It may grow, develop or expand, change alliances or organizations, and it does combine with others even as cells do.  Your body does not feel as if you invade it.  Your consciousness and its consciousness are merged; yet it is composed of the multitudinous individual consciousnesses that form the tiniest physical particles within it.  What was physically a part of you last year is not today.  Physically, you are a different person.  Put simply, the stuff of the body is constantly returned to the earth, where it forms again into physical actualization – but always differently.

In somewhat the same way your identity changes constantly, even while you retain your sense of permanence.  That sense of permanence rides upon endless changes – it is actually dependent upon those physical, spiritual, and psychic changes.  In your terms, for example, if they did not occur constantly your body would die.  The cells, again, are not simply minute, handy, unseen particles that happen to compose your organs.  They also possess consciousness of their own.  That [kind of] consciousness unites all physical matter.

There is indeed a communication existing that joins all of nature, an inner web work, so that each part of the earth knows what its other parts are doing.  Cells are organizations, ever-changing, forming and unforming.

Cells compose natural forms.  An identity is not a thing of a certain size or shape that must always appear in one given way.  It is a unit of consciousness ever itself and inviolate while still free to form other organizations, enter other combinations in which all other units also decide to play a part.  As there are different shapes to physical objects, then, so identity can take different shapes – and basically those forms are far more rich and diverse than the variety of physical objects.

You speak about the chromosomes.  Your scientists write about heredity, buried and coded in the genes, blueprints for an identity not yet formed.  But there are psychic blueprints, so to speak, wherein each identity knows of its “history”; and taking any given line of development, projects that history.  The potential of such an identity is far greater, however, than can ever be expressed through any physical one-line kind of development.

Identities, then, do send out “strands of consciousness” into as many realities as possible, so that all versions of any given identity have the potential to develop in as many ways as possible.

You, as you think of yourself, may have trouble following such concepts, just as you would have trouble trying to follow the “future” reality of the cells within your body at this moment.  You must understand that in greater terms there is no big and small.  There is not a giant identity and a pygmy one.  Each identity is inviolate.  Each also unites with others while maintaining its individuality and developing its own potential.

A mountain exists.  It is composed of rocks and trees, grass and hills, and in your terms of time you can look at it, see it as such, give it a name, and ignore its equally independent parts.  Without those parts the mountain would not exist.  It is not invaded by the trees or rocks that compose it, and while trees grow and die the mountain itself, at least in your terms of time, exists despite the changes.  It is also dependent upon the changes.  In a manner of speaking, your own identities as you think of them are dependent upon the same kinds of living organizations of consciousness.

Let us look at it differently.  People who read so-called “occult” literature may consider me “an old soul”, like a mountain.  In grand ancient fashion above other homey village-like souls, I have my own identity.  Yet that identity is composed of other identities, each independent, as the mountain is composed of its rocks and could not exist without them, even while it rises up so grandly above the plain.  My understanding rests upon what I am, as the mountain’s heights rest upon what it is.  I do not feel invaded by the selves or identities that compose me, nor do they feel invaded by me – any more than the trees, rocks, and grass would resent the mountain shape into which they have grown.

The top of the mountain can “see further”: Its view takes in the entire countryside.  So I can look into your reality, as the top of the mountain can look down to the plain and the village.  The mountain peak and the village are equally legitimate.

Let us look at this again in another way.

Your thinking mind, as you consider it, is the top of your mountain.  In certain terms you can see “more” than your cells can, though they are also conscious of their realities.  Were it not for their lives you would not be at the top of your psychological mountain.  Even the trees at the highest tip of the hillside send sturdy roots into the ground, and receive from it nourishment and vitality – and there is a great give-and-take between the smallest sapling in the foothills and the most ancient pine.  No single blade of grass dies but that it affects the entire mountain.  The energy within the grass sinks into the earth, and in your terms is again reborn.  Trees, rocks, and grass constantly exchange places as energy changes form.

Water rushes down the hillside into the valley, and there is constant give-and-take between the village below, say, or the meadows, and the mountain.  So there is the same kind of transformation, change, and cooperation between all identities.  You can draw the lines where you will for convenience’s sake, but each identity retains its individuality and inviolate nature even while it constantly changes.

Trees bear seeds.  Some fall nearby.  Others are carried by the wind some distances into areas that the tree itself, for all of its height, could not perceive.

The tree does not feel less, itself, because it brings forth such seeds.  So identities throw off seeds of themselves in somewhat the same fashion.  These may grow up in quite different environments.  Their realities in no way threaten the identity of the “parent”.  Identities have free choice, so they will pick their environments or birthplaces.

Because a tree is physical, physical properties will be involved, and the seeds will mature following certain general principles or characteristics.  Atoms and molecules will sometimes form trees; sometimes they will become parts of couches.  They will form people or ants or blades of grass, yet in each of these ventures they will also retain their own sense of identity.  They combine to form cells and organs, and through all of these events they obtain different kinds of experience.

Physically speaking, and generally, your body is composed of grasses and ants and rocks and beasts and birds, for in one way or another all biological matter is related.  In certain terms, through your experience, birds and rocks speak alphabets – and certain portions of your own being fly or creep as birds or insects, forming the great gestalt of physical experience.  It is fashionable to say: “You are what you eat”; that, for example, “You must not eat meat because you are killing the animals, and this is wrong”.  But in deeper terms, physically and biologically, the animals are born from the body of the earth, which is composed of the corpses of men and women as much as it is of other matter.  The animals consume you, then, as often as you consume them, and they are as much a part of your humanity as you are a part of their so called animal nature.

The constant interchange that exists biologically means that the same physical stuff that composes a man or a woman may be dispersed, and later form a toad, a starfish, a dog or a flower.  It may be distributed into numberless different forms.  That arithmetic of consciousness is not annihilated.  It is multiplied and not divided.  Reminiscent within each form is the consciousness of all the other combinations, all of the other alliances, as identity continually forms new creative endeavors and gestalts of relatedness.  There is no discrimination, no prejudice.

When you eat, you must eliminate through your bowels.  That resulting matter eventually returns to the earth, where it helps form all other living things.  The “dead” matter – the residue of a bird, the sloughed-off cells – these things are not then used by other birds (though they may be occasionally), but by men and women.  There is no rule that says your discarded cellular material can be used only by your own species.  Yet in your terms any identity, no matter how “minute”, retains itself and its identity through many forms and alliances of organizations.

Through such strands of consciousness all of your world is related.  Your own identity sends out strands of itself constantly, then.  These mix psychically with other strands, as physically atoms and molecules are interchanged.  So there are different organizations of identity in which you play a part.

Ruburt is connected with me in that manner.  He is also connected with any ant in the backyard in the same way.  Yet I retain my identity, the ant retains its identity, and Ruburt retains his.  But one could not exist without the other two – for in greater terms the reality of any one of the three presupposes the existence of the others.