Wednesday, June 17, 2015

The Physical Nature of Perception (2)

Seth Early Sessions, Vol 9, Session 463


The Physical Nature of Perception (2)


Returning to the material on perception, there are changes in the positive and negative atomic charges, alterations of movement inside the atoms in the smaller particles, a change in pulsation rate.  The activity of molecules actually is caused by perceptive qualities.  To begin with, atoms do not just move within themselves because they move because they are atoms.

The constant motion within them is caused by the constant perceptive nature of any consciousness, however minute in your terms.

Each of the atoms or particles within the molecule are perceptively aware of all the other particles within the given molecule.  They move in response to stimuli received from each other, and to stimuli that come from other molecules.

Each molecule within a cell, for example, is aware of the activity of each of the other molecules, and to some extent of the stimuli that comes to the cell itself from outside it.

Perceptions in general physical terms usually seem to involve information picked up from an arbitrarily designated structure, of an event seemingly occurring in another structure outside of itself.  In the entire act of perception, however, there is a oneness and a unity between the seemingly objectively perceived event and the perceiver.

The entire act has its own electromagnetic reality, and the event is actually electromagnetic motion.  The movement within the atoms mentioned earlier therefore is a part, basically, of the entire perceived event.

Egotistically you make arbitrary designations of necessity, perceiving only portions of any given action; again, the ego attempting to separate itself from overall action, and to see itself as an entirely independent structure.

Now.  Perception is constant.  There is no place where one perception begins and another ends.

Remember that you are a part of what you perceive.  Now in many instances of so-called paranormal perception there is what would seem to you a reversal of focus.  It seems to you that the burden of perception in on your part as perceiver.

Your in quotes “unity” with the event that seems to exist outside of you is not understood.  In paranormal instances you change your focus largely, throwing it into the seemingly independent event.

There are constant interchanges on all levels.  I will try to explain this to you more clearly.  Remember also in your terms that the seemingly independent perceived event and its nature is changed and altered by your own perception of it.

Any physical perception is actually an action response at a psychic level to thoughts and emotions, and these exist independently of their physical counterparts.  The thoughts and emotions however also have their own electromagnetic reality.

Physically then you perceive an approximation of an inner event.  The inner event basically is not physical.  Now, as simply as I can put this, thoughts and emotions form, of their own electromagnetic reality, vitalized physical products called atoms and molecules.  This is basically what I told you in our early analogy with the mazes and the wires.

From your viewpoint, you only see the physical product.

Now.  To some very valid extent in our sessions, changes occur then within Ruburt’s physical organism, for in responding to my communications, electromagnetic alterations are therefore inevitable.  You have however more of a merging.  I do not for example completely take over.  There is a complementary merging with my patterns however predominating mentally and psychically, and to a large extent emotionally.

On occasion the change can be noticeable enough however so that the physical resemblance changes, Ruburt looking far less like Ruburt, comparatively speaking.

On the one hand his own personality is enlarged in that the self structure includes far more perceptions than ordinarily.  Further actions are recognized and interpreted.  The speaking systems however and mental faculties have to be trained to handle the additional data; this of course causing some distortions along the way.

They are unavoidable.  The emotional system of the medium must also learn to handle further stimuli, and then also learn to do so in such a way that balance is maintained.

Another dimension in your terms is simply added, a more extensive one, and when this training is done properly, as I have tried to do, then the medium’s personality is not only strengthened but its abilities used far above the usual normal.  The process however is highly involved with perception, and is largely a matter in learning to handle, recognize and use constructively perceptions that other personalities are not equipped to handle.

Now, when you see what Ruburt can do occasionally, and the troubles I can have with distortion, then you can be sure that I would not double or triple the chances for distortion by attempting to speak through anyone else.  He need not worry.  Beside, I like him too well.

There is also something else that he seems to have forgotten – that your own relationships, yours and Ruburt’s and the relationships between us in the past, do much to make our communication possible.  You transmit also, or rather you act as a transmitter whether you are at a session or not.  So unless there is another identical Ruburt and Joseph combination, I am stuck with you. (Smile)

Now in the past, in your distant past, when I spoke through others, or portions of my entity did so, then such personal connections also existed with those through whom we communicated.


No comments:

Post a Comment