Rita on higher dimensions

What would I ask?

DeMarco, Frank. Rita's World: A View from the Non-Physical (Kindle Location's 4544). Rainbow Ridge Books. Kindle Edition

(Q)  First question in Charles's list is, "What questions does she wish she had asked bu didn't when she was in 3D?"

(A) I understand the sense of the question.  Literally, the answer would be "none", because I am well content with where we went, what I recoved, how it went.  But in the sense Charles meant it - more or less, what in retrospect might have been a productive approach that, in fact, we didn't think to try - I think it would have been an extension of your basic question.

(Q)  What would I ask if I had enough sense to know what I ought to ask?

(A)  Yes, that one.  Because that amounts to saying, "I know that my perspective is limited to the extent that I allow my time-slice-delimited consciousness to try to run the show, and I know that my non-3D consciousness has a perspective that is wider and undistorted by this limitation of the moving present - so slip me a clue, and I'll gladly listen".  But it isn't a tragedy that I didn't think to do that - and, in a way, any time spent listening to Guidance amounts to doing just that, in any case.

(Q)  So, to put it in terms of the lives we in 3D are leading at the moment -

(A)  Guidance is always there, always willing.  Connect to it by your intentto be guided, and it is the equivalent of asking the question you would ask if you had sense enough to know on your own.  You, as a 3D-bounded intelligence connected inseparably to a non-3D part of yourself, willknow, doknow. Clarify the channel and you will have all you need, all you can handle, at any given moment.

Higher dimensions? 

(A)  Charles's second question may be answered in a line - that is the purpose and the scope of this entire series of communications.

(Q)  His second was, "What questions did she ask when in 3D that remained confusing or unanswered but have been clarified or answered in non-3D?"  So how about, "Is her larger being communicating with the dimensions 'above' herss in the same way she is communicating with you?"

(A)  I see i have not yet communicated this clearly.  I am tempted to skip on, because this requires some work on your part - that is, it isnt short and sweet - but the next items aren't any easier, so we might as well plow into this one.

The confusion is partly inherent in language, partly a matter of confusion of background.  Let's see how we can go about this.

First, remember that there is one big difference between 3D and non-3D, and that is the set of conditions 3D was created to have so that it could create and nourish compound beings.  3D has:

·     perception of separation in space and time

·     delayed consequences

·     a "moving present moment" that makes choice a continuing necessity/possibility

These conditions do not apply outside of 3D.  In non-3D it is clear that connections are as real as separations; manifestation is instant (that is, there is no perception of external versus internal); and although we experience separation of events, or of states of being, in the way produced by time in 3D, we are not helplessly carried along as in a river, and we do not lose our perspective (thinking "the present moment" more important than the others).  In a sense, we live continually in the present; in another sense, we live continually in all time.  We may pursue that later, if you wish - I rather expect that Charles will wish! - but the present point is that 3D and non-3D are different experiences in a way that is unique.  It is a mistake to think that, therefore, we in non-3D are distinguished from another "layer" in the same way that you in 3D experience yourselves separated from non-3D.

(Q)  And, anyway, we aren't really separated from non-3D at all.

(A)  Well, your experience is separate, unless and until and to the extent that you broaden your awareness to encompass dimensions that are often blurred by the intensity and narrowness of focus of 3D experience.

(Q)  So, to paraphrase, the 3D/non-3D frontier is not a model for another such frontier above or beyond our own non-3D components.