Unknown Reality, Session 686
Basically, the cell’s comprehension
straddles time as you think of it.
Mankind’s consciousness, however,
experimented along time-specific lines.
As he developed along those lines, various biological and mental
methods of selectivity and discrimination were utilized. When in historic terms mankind became aware
of memory, and recalled his past as a past in your terms, it was possible for
him to confuse past and present. Vivid
memories, out of context but given immediate neurological validity, could
compete with the brilliant focus necessary in his present.
Though the past is actually quite as
immediate, alive, and creative as the present is, man made certain adjustments,
on several layers, that would focus definite distinctions and set past and
present experience apart. While your
particular kind of consciousness was developing, it began to intensify
selectivity, to concentrate specifically in a small area of activity while
blocking out other data. This was
necessary because the particular kind of physical manipulation of corporal
existence required instant physical response to immediately present stimuli.
Such selectivity and specialization
therefore represented a pertinent method, as consciousness familiarized itself
with earthly experience. Hunters had to
respond at once to the present situation.
In time terms, the “present” animal had to be killed for food – not the
“past” animal. That animal – that
past one – existed as surely as the one presently perceived, yet in man’s
context, physical action had to be directed to a highly specific area, for
physical survival depended upon it.
The cells’ basic innocence of time discrimination
had to be bypassed. At deeply
unconscious levels the neurological structure is more highly adaptable than it
appears. Adjustments were made,
therefore. Basically, the neurological
structure responds to both past and future data. Biologically, then, such activity is
built-in. The specialized “new” kind of
consciousness in one body had to respond pinpoint fast. Therefore, it focused upon only one series of
neurological messages.
These became more and more biologically
prominent, so that man’s consciousness rode them, or leaped upon
them. These particular pulses or
messages became the biologically and mentally accepted ones. They were clued into sense perception, then. These pulses or messages became the only official
data that, translated into sense perception, formed physical reality. This selectivity gave an understandable line
of reference from interior to exterior existence.
Other quite-as-valid messages were
ignored. They became, while present,
biologically invisible. The cells
still reacted to these otherwise neglected pulses, as they needed data from
both the past and future to maintain the body’s balance in “the present”. The necessity for immediate conscious
exterior action at a “definite” point of intersection with events
was left to the emerging ego consciousness.
While the cells required future and past
data, and used it to form from that invisible tension the body’s present
corporal reality, the same kind of information could be a threat then to
the ego consciousness, which could be overwhelmed. Within the corporal structure, however, there
are indeed messages that leap too quickly or too slowly from your viewpoint to
allow for any physical response. In that
way cellular comprehension is allowed its free flow; but the selectivity
mentioned (in sessions 682-683) bypasses
such information, so that it does not conflict with present sense data requiring
physical action in time.
Other pulses, carrying messages, are quite
as valid as those that you perceive and physically react to. Again, the cells respond to those
constantly. The body, as mentioned (in
the 685th session) is an electromagnetic pattern, poised in a web of
probabilities, experienced as corporal at an intersection point in space and
time.
When man, speaking in terms of history,
began to experiment with memory, there were innumerable instances where the
emerging ego consciousness did not distinguish clearly enough between the past
and present, as you understand them.
The past, in the present, would appear so
brilliantly that man could not react adequately in circumstances of time that
he had himself created. The future was
blocked, practically speaking, to preserve freedom of action and to encourage
physical exploration, curiosity, and creativity. With memory, however, mental projections
into the future were of course also possible so that man could plan his
activities in time, and foresee probable results: “Ghost images” of the future
probabilities always acted as mental stimuli for physical explorations in all
areas, and of all kinds. These ghost
images provided stimuli for mental, spiritual, and physical experience.
The race was dealing with the creation of a
new world of physical experience. To do
this particular kind of experiment, it was necessary that physical manipulation
be concentrated upon. Ghost images from
the future were one thing, inspiring mankind.
Had such data instantly appeared before him, however, man would have
been deprived of the physical joys, endeavors, and challenges that were so basic
to the experiment itself.
It would have been quite possible for you
as a race to have chosen any other “series” of neurological pulses, or
messages, as the “real” ones, and to structure your experience along different
lines. The biological structure and the
mental consciousness together, however, chose the most comfortable sequence in
which a present area of activity, brought about by neurological recognition,
would be backed up by unconscious mental knowledge and other biologically invisible
neurological connections.
The psyche knows itself and is aware of its
parts. When ego consciousness reached a
certain point of biological and mental competence, when experience in the
present became extensive enough, then ego consciousness would be at the stage
where it could begin to accept greater data.
Indeed, it is now at that stage.
Its focus in the present is now
secure. That focus finally brought
about, in your terms, an expansion of consciousness, and one that early man did
not have to handle. In your terms, time
now includes more space, and hence more experience and stimuli. Again speaking historically, in the past the
private person in any given hour was aware at once only of those events
happening in his immediate environment.
He could respond instantly. Events
were, to that extent now, manageable.
The ego specialized in expansions of space
and its physical manipulation. It
specialized with objects. As a result,
now, a person in any given hour is aware of events happening at the other end
of the world. No immediate physical
response he or she can make seems adequate or pertinent on many occasions. Bodily physical action, then, to that
extent, loses its immaculate precision in time. You cannot kick an “enemy” who does not live
in your village or country; an enemy, furthermore, whom you do not even know
personally. Again, to that extent
instant physical action in time is not the same kind of life-and-death factor
that it was when a man was faced with an enraged animal, or enemy, in close
combat.
In the past in the same way, love could be
immediately expressed. In historic
terms, early man, using here your theories about the race – early man – was in
intimate contact with his family, clan, or tribe. With the developing expansion of space,
however, loved ones often dwell far apart, and suddenly bodily response cannot
be expressed at once, at a particular point of immediate contact.
These developments, with others, are
already triggering changes in man’s behavior, and inspiring him toward further
alterations of consciousness. He now
needs a more expansive viewpoint of past and future in order to help him deal with
the ramifications of the present as it has evolved through experience.
Recognized concepts of the self are the ego’s
interpretation of selfhood. They are
projected into concepts of God and the universe. They meet with a certain biological validity
because of the selectivity earlier mentioned, whereby only one series of
neurological pulses is accepted – and upon these rides the reality of the
egotistical self. At one “time” a god
interpreted in those terms served as a model for the egotistical behavior of
one self toward another self.
In a world in which individuals were
confined in space in a tribe or clan, action was immediate. The environment presented a framework in
which consciousness learned to deal with stimuli in a direct fashion. It learned how to focus. The necessary specialization meant that only
so much data could be handled at once, emotionally or otherwise. The formation of different tribes allowed man
to behave cooperatively in small numbers.
This meant that those on the outside were selectively ignored,
considered strangers.
At that point, consciousness in
those terms could not handle focused concentration, the emergence of ego
consciousness, and simultaneously experience powerful feelings of oneness with
other large groups. It was struggling
for individuation.
Individuation, however, was dependent upon
the cooperation of individuals. As the
ego learned to feel more secure, the cooperative tendencies broadened so that
the growth of nations was possible. It
was inevitable, however, that ego consciousness would produce a reality in
which it would finally need, in those terms, to accept other data and
information that in the beginning it had to ignore.
I am speaking so far in historic terms, as
you understand them. History, however,
is but your official line of accepted stimuli.
Later in the book that will be made clear.
As egotistical consciousness expands to
include hereto largely neglected data, then it will experience, practically
speaking, a new kind of identity; knowing itself differently. Its concepts of godhood will significantly
alter, as will the dimensions of emotion.
Your heritage includes vastly richer veins of love, yet your concepts of
self and godhood have severely limited these.
You often seem to hate those with different beliefs than your own, for
example, and you have perpetuated cruelties upon others in the name of religion
and in the name of science, because your limited ideas about the nature of self
led you to fear your emotions. Often you
are afraid that love will overwhelm you, for instance.
While you were so concerned with protecting
what you thought of as the boundaries and integrity of one selfhood, as a race
you actually arrived at a point where you were beginning to deny your own
greater reality. But all of this is part
of the experiment upon which the race embarked in your probability.
Where your physical survival, in those
terms, once depended upon a narrowed focus while you learned physical
manipulation, now the success of that manipulation necessitates a broadening of
focus – a new awakening into the larger existence of the selfhood, with what
will be a corresponding rerecognition of neurological activity that is now only
briefly sensed by some, but present in the heritage of your corporal structure.
Here, and throughout this book there will
be sections dealing with Practice Elements where to some extent you can see how
certain of these concepts can be practically experienced, and receive at least
a hint of their applications.
Practice Element 1
In a waking state, Ruburt found himself in Saratoga
Springs, N.Y., where he grew up, in what seemed to be a kind of mental
projection. Everything was gray. The immediate nature of full-blast sense data
was missing. Vision was clear but
spotty, highly selective. Motion was,
however, the strongest sense element.
Ruburt was bodiless on the one hand, and on the other he perceived some
of the experience through the eyes of an infant in a carriage.
Quite sharply he perceived a particular
curb at the corner of a definite intersection, and his attention was caught by
the focus a curb, a slope of dirt, and then the sidewalk; and the motion of the
carriage as it was wheeled up.
The child was himself in the past on the
one hand, and yet he was a probable future self in that past. From the standpoint of Ruburt’s official mental
focus, and from the standpoint of the neurologically accepted present, that
past environment had to remain off-center, or blurred. He could experience it only by sidestepping
officially accepted neurological activity.
He visited a store that is not at that location “anymore”, and here the
sense data were somewhat clearer. He had
no conscious memories of the store’s interior, yet it was instantly apparent to
him – the dark oiled floor, spread with sawdust. Even the odors were present.
He toured his grade school where he
attended kindergarten to third grade, saw the children come out for recess, and
felt himself one of them – while during the entire experience he knew himself
as an adult, embarked upon that adventure.
He went from place to place, floating
bodiless – a tour of consciousness. That
same environment exists now, alternatively with Ruburt’s present, and as
vividly as his present does. It was,
however, from his viewpoint, a probable past.
The infant with whom he momentarily
identified as the self he is now only opaquely and indirectly shared
common experience. This was not simple
regression, then. That child grew
up in that probability, and Ruburt grew up in this one. He touched upon certain coordinates that were
neurologically shared, however, by both: He and the child were familiar with
the carriage and the curb, the mother who pushed the carriage, and the house
into which Ruburt felt himself, as the child, being carried.
He sensed the house interior and the
stairway vividly. He knew that the
mother then went down the stairs to bring in the carriage, but when he tried to
perceive this, the motion became too fast.
The mother’s figure blurred so completely that he could not follow
it. He felt confused, and found himself
entering the store around the corner, and then consciously circled the block
and went into the school.
The school and the store were not in the
infant’s experience, for in that probability the family moved away. The blur of activity earlier was the result
of neurological confusion, and Ruburt switched over unknowingly to an
environment still in the same physical block that was meaningful to him,
but not shared by the future experience of that infant. You must understand that your own past exists
as vitally as does your present – but your probable pasts and presents
exist in the same manner. You simply do
not accept them in the strands of experience that “you” recognize.
As part of the work on this book, Ruburt is
just beginning to experiment with the conscious recognition of probable
material, and the conscious acceptance of kinds of experience usually tabooed
according to the selectivity already mentioned.
In the sleep state after our last session,
then, he allowed his consciousness to expand enough so that it became aware of
information and experience usually censored automatically through mental and
neurological habit. In Adventures In Consciousness Ruburt uses
the term “prejudiced perception” – an excellent one – that is applicable
here. For you have prejudiced yourself
spiritually, mentally, and physically in those terms. In the sleep state Ruburt became unprejudiced
at least to some degree, so that he encountered information that seemed alien
or out of context with usual experience.
Your theories of time are connected with
your usual neurological pulses. It is
one thing to play with concepts of multidimensionality, or probabilities, and
quite another to be practically presented with them, even briefly, when your thought
patterns and neurological habits tell you that they cannot be translated. So Ruburt felt frustrated, and he told me in
no uncertain terms that his consciousness could not contain the information he
was receiving.
Like a good teacher, I took his protests
into consideration. Later he wrote a
statement that came to him. This was his
conscious interpretation of the information he had received the night before,
translated as best he could in linear terms.
I have my own existence, that is quite
different from Ruburt’s, and yet I also have a reality that is connected to his
psyche. Each of you also have the same
kind of connection with “more knowledgeable” portions of yourself, or your
greater identity, that are independently themselves and yet also alive in your
psyches. They are portions of the “unknown”
reality.
Now I am able to obtain information that
Ruburt, in his terms, does not have.
In other terms he does have it, and so do you, but you have been
mentally, spiritually, and biologically prejudiced against it. As a race, you are ready to become more aware
of your greater reality, however, and to explore its “unknown” aspects. Hence this book.
You may experience some irritability with some
of the concepts in it, simply because you have so schooled yourselves to ignore
them. You should also experience an acceleration
of consciousness, however, and as you read it, a growing sense of
familiarity. The framework of the book
itself will lead you, if you allow it, into other strata of your own greater
knowledge.
No comments:
Post a Comment