Seth Speaks, Appendix, ESP Class Tuesday, January 5, 1971
Ancient Rome exists, and so does
Egypt and Atlantis. You not only form
the future, as you think of it, but you also form the past. You have been told simple tales, and they are
delightful ones; but if you were not ready to hear more you would not be in
this room.
You and your reincarnated selves,
or personalities, are not imprisoned in time.
There is a constant interchange going on between what you think of as
your present self, and your past and future selves. If this were not the case, then I would not
be speaking here, for I am not Ruburt’s past self. Each personality is free. Time has open ends in all directions or such
a thing as probabilities would not exist.
Therefore, actions that you make now can help a so-called past
personality; and a so-called future personality may step in and help you along
your weary way.
Also, your actions now can affect
the future personality as well as the past one.
You must try to stretch your imagination and feel these realities,
because the intellect alone cannot comprehend them. Psychological time is your best method for
perceiving actualities.
You can feel what you cannot
necessarily describe verbally, for you are more than the physical brain that
you have now. I am no poet, but as in
one of Ruburt’s poems, think of the brain as a web your form about the inner
self. This webwork helps you manipulate
in a world of space and time, and is as nebulous, precarious and delicate as
any spider’s web – and in as precarious a balance. You form this and then perceive the world, but
your viewpoint is very small and the garden you perceive very intimate. You have, however, far greater abilities of
perception. I want you to understand the
nature of your inner self, or soul, for it is a focal point of reality from
which other realities spring. It is not
imprisoned in tiny boxes of days or weeks or months, or even centuries.
(During
break a student wanted to know if Seth was a part of Jane’s personality.)
Ruburt cannot and answer you as
easily as I can. We were originally a
portion of the same entity. I evolved
along my own ways and he evolved along his.
Therefore we are both independent.
(“In
other words, all parts of the entity are evolving? Are they developing as one?”)
I evolved to form my own
entity. Ruburt will also, but he is not
at that stage yet, in your terms. In
another frame of reference he is, of course.
He also contains those portions of himslelf that are less developed, for
they all exist as one. All the parts of
himself are aware of this correspondence.
In your terms only, I could be referred to – and I have told Ruburt this
– as a sixth self of his in his future; but this is only to get the idea
across, for he will not become what I am.
That is impossible. I am myself.
There are certain answers that
cannot be given verbally, but must be intuitively understood. Yet the fact that I exist and can communicate
should show you, in simple terms, that other “higher aspects” of your
personality can help you out on occasion.
(“Have
you always taught on reincarnation?”)
Teaching has been my main object,
but I have not always been a teacher. I
was a spice merchant at one time. A
round and fat and heavy spice merchant.
...
We learned what spices would do long before the present generation got
hung-up on grass. We got high on the
high seas, sniffing oregano. We brought
spices to Denmark; we had delightful trips indeed. We explored far down the coast of
Africa. I was quite a gourmet.
All your so-called pasts exist
within you now, and you can recapture your memories and discover what they
are. You are not imprisoned in time
unless you believe that you are, and there is nothing more important than
belief. If you believe that you exist only
within the context of this life, that you are born only to death and
annihilation, then you will not use your freedoms in this existence. You deny their abilities when they show
themselves, yet no one forces this bondage upon you but yourself. To understand your multidimensional self is
to use it.
(… commented that Seth did not give
many predictions.)
I am not cautious, I am simply
realistic. When you understand the
nature of reality, then you realize that predictions of future events are
basically meaningless. You can predict
some events and they can occur, but you create the future in every moment.
Time, in your terms, is
plastic. Most predictions are made in a
highly distorted fashion; they can lead the public astray. Not only that, but when the predictors fall
flat on their faces it does not help “The Cause”. Reality does not exist in that fashion. You can tune in to certain probabilities and
predict “that they will occur”, but free will always operates. No god in a giant ivory tower says, “This
will happen February 15 ant 8:05”. And
if no god predicts, then I do not see the point of doing so myself.
(“What
about precognitive dreams?”)
Some are entirely legitimate. Often, however, the suggestion involved in a
dream brings about the event, so it seems when the dream becomes real that you
have looked into a future that already existed.
Instead you have formed the event, not realizing that it had its origins
at the time you slept. The question
cannot be answered simply for there are many ramifications, but from this
instant of reality you form and change not only the future, but the past. In the operation of probabilities this has
great significance, for this means that you change and affect all events, and
that your books are a delightful fiction that tell you only your current ideas
about the past.
(“How
can I change my way of thinking to keep my family well, instead of making them
sick?”)
Back here, we have a question from
the gallery. You must realize that you
do not form events alone. You are
involved in a cooperative venture.
Usually then you alone are not responsible for an event, because others
participate in its creation – for their own reasons. The question cannot be answered simply in one
evening, but each consciousness has its own defense system and its own
vitality; you should trust your own.
You cooperate together to form the
physical reality that you know, telepathically, through ways and means that are
unknown to you. You weave webs of
psychic reality that then coalesce into physical reality. You do not necessarily weave them alone, but
together. Your thoughts intertwine with
those of others. You are responsible for
your own thoughts. You need to learn the
power of thought and emotion, but this should fill you with the joy of
creativity. Once you realize that your
thoughts form reality, then you are no longer a slave to events. You simply have to learn the methods.
(“But
I don’t know how to learn them.”)
You will learn them here. You will learn them through reading, and
through listening to your inner self.
The methods have been known for centuries; not only centuries as you
think of them, but for the lifetime of this earth as you know it, and even
before – when the poles were reversed and when there were other stars in the
sky and when the planets were not the planets that you know.
(“Where
did you get the oregano, and in what form did you sniff it?”)
It was in the Indies and it was
dry.
(One
of the subjects discussed at break concerned the degree of “permanence” of the
physical human form.)
In our own sessions I have
explained something that I haven’t mentioned in class, and it is this: For
every moment of time that you seem to exist in this universe, you do not exist
in it. The atoms and molecules have a
pulsating nature that you do not usually perceive, so what seems to you to be a
continuous atom or molecule is, instead, a series of pulsations that you cannot
keep track of.
Physical matter is not
permanent. You only perceive it as
continuous; your perceptive mechanisms are not equipped to detect the
pulsations. Now I am speaking to our
friend over here (an engineer)
because he may perhaps have a comprehension of what I am trying to explain,
because of his background.
(“Are
these pulses extremely fast in our terms?”)
They are indeed. In certain conditions however, the inner
self, abandoning its usual reliance upon the physical senses, is aware of these
periods that would seem to you to be negations.
Your consciousness fluctuates in
the same way. It is here and then it is
not here, but the physical self focuses upon only those moments of physical
reality. Because consciousness
fluctuates however, other portions of your self have memory of those times when
it is not focused in “physical reality”, and this is also a portion of your
entire existence.
This isn’t half as complicated as
it sounds. Whether or not you remember
your dreams, for example, a certain portion of you, under hypnosis, could
remember every dream that you ever had in your life. So a certain portion of you remembers those
nonmoments when you are not focused in physical reality, when your existence is
in another dimension of actuality entirely and you are perceiving what I will
call, in your terms of reference, nonintervals.
I like the term nonintervals better than nonmoments.
(“Is
this noninterval a moment of this existence?”)
It is indeed, in this existence;
and also these nonintervals are moments in other dimensions of reality.
(“Might
this be compared to the rotating light in a lighthouse?”)
It may, if you like the analogy.
(“Are
there more than two pulses?”)
There are, and the whole self is
aware of all of these realities. With no
unkindness meant, you all know yourselves and your weaknesses and failures, so
why should you suppose that the self you know is the only self that you
are? Surely, it has occurred to you that
you have abilities you are not using, that other realities connected with your
innermost existence aren’t being expressed in the existence you know of.
I want you to think about the
implications of what I have said concerning nonintervals.
(“Would
a noninterval be a positive interval to another aspect of our existence?”)
It is, and they would not perceive
your existence here, for to them it would be a noninterval.
(“Could
this be the key to the simultaneous existence of all of our lives, the key to
nontime?”)
Yes, indeed. And some evening I will tell you that you
should change your conception of the word “lives”. This is the first hint I have given, either
in our private sessions or in class, of some rather important material. But think of what you mean when you use the
word lives, and see how limited the term is.
I am going to end our session, but
I have a comment. I have said this
before: Now if you understand that remark and think about it, you will
understand much that is behind what I have said this evening.
(“Then
we are as alive now as we have ever been?”)
That is correct – except that in
the life in which you are now involved, you are not focusing upon the full
potential of your vitality.
(“Was
there a continent of Mu?”)
There was. Now, I tell you to remember your dreams. In your context I will tell you again not
only to remember your dreams, but to learn to come awake in the middle of them
and realize that you can manipulate within them. You form them. They are yours, not something thrust upon you
in which you are powerless.
(“We
are using our existence as the dream?”)
What I have said applies to what
you just said. In one context what you
call physical reality is a dream, but in a larger context it is a dream that
you have created. When you realize that
you form it you come into the memory of your whole self.
And when you realize that you form
the events of your life in the same way, you will learn to take hold of your
entire consciousness in whatever aspect it shows itself in this life. Through all of this you must realize that you
are not powerless. Remember, also, that
this life is a dimension of experience and reality even if it is, in contrast,
a dream in a higher level of reality in which you have your larger
consciousness.
Now the question should have been was how many of us here are part of the Seth/Rubart entity. I bet his answer would have floored them.
ReplyDeleteTrue. I don't see entities as fixed things (like we tend to see our physical bodies and our physical lineage). They're more like frequencies (multidimensional of course) and all of us who have ever taken part in the saga of Gaia could have a "Seth entity" component. I suppose it's a bit like superposition in quantum mechanics. At one level I'm a "component" of "you" responding to "you".
ReplyDelete