Friday, November 13, 2015

Time

Seth Speaks, Appendix, ESP Class Tuesday, January 5, 1971


Ancient Rome exists, and so does Egypt and Atlantis.  You not only form the future, as you think of it, but you also form the past.  You have been told simple tales, and they are delightful ones; but if you were not ready to hear more you would not be in this room.

You and your reincarnated selves, or personalities, are not imprisoned in time.  There is a constant interchange going on between what you think of as your present self, and your past and future selves.  If this were not the case, then I would not be speaking here, for I am not Ruburt’s past self.  Each personality is free.  Time has open ends in all directions or such a thing as probabilities would not exist.  Therefore, actions that you make now can help a so-called past personality; and a so-called future personality may step in and help you along your weary way.

Also, your actions now can affect the future personality as well as the past one.  You must try to stretch your imagination and feel these realities, because the intellect alone cannot comprehend them.  Psychological time is your best method for perceiving actualities.

You can feel what you cannot necessarily describe verbally, for you are more than the physical brain that you have now.  I am no poet, but as in one of Ruburt’s poems, think of the brain as a web your form about the inner self.  This webwork helps you manipulate in a world of space and time, and is as nebulous, precarious and delicate as any spider’s web – and in as precarious a balance.  You form this and then perceive the world, but your viewpoint is very small and the garden you perceive very intimate.  You have, however, far greater abilities of perception.  I want you to understand the nature of your inner self, or soul, for it is a focal point of reality from which other realities spring.  It is not imprisoned in tiny boxes of days or weeks or months, or even centuries.

(During break a student wanted to know if Seth was a part of Jane’s personality.)

Ruburt cannot and answer you as easily as I can.  We were originally a portion of the same entity.  I evolved along my own ways and he evolved along his.  Therefore we are both independent.

(“In other words, all parts of the entity are evolving?  Are they developing as one?”)

I evolved to form my own entity.  Ruburt will also, but he is not at that stage yet, in your terms.  In another frame of reference he is, of course.  He also contains those portions of himslelf that are less developed, for they all exist as one.  All the parts of himself are aware of this correspondence.  In your terms only, I could be referred to – and I have told Ruburt this – as a sixth self of his in his future; but this is only to get the idea across, for he will not become what I am.  That is impossible.  I am myself.

There are certain answers that cannot be given verbally, but must be intuitively understood.  Yet the fact that I exist and can communicate should show you, in simple terms, that other “higher aspects” of your personality can help you out on occasion.

(“Have you always taught on reincarnation?”)

Teaching has been my main object, but I have not always been a teacher.  I was a spice merchant at one time.  A round and fat and heavy spice merchant.

...  We learned what spices would do long before the present generation got hung-up on grass.  We got high on the high seas, sniffing oregano.  We brought spices to Denmark; we had delightful trips indeed.  We explored far down the coast of Africa.  I was quite a gourmet.

All your so-called pasts exist within you now, and you can recapture your memories and discover what they are.  You are not imprisoned in time unless you believe that you are, and there is nothing more important than belief.  If you believe that you exist only within the context of this life, that you are born only to death and annihilation, then you will not use your freedoms in this existence.  You deny their abilities when they show themselves, yet no one forces this bondage upon you but yourself.  To understand your multidimensional self is to use it.

(… commented that Seth did not give many predictions.)

I am not cautious, I am simply realistic.  When you understand the nature of reality, then you realize that predictions of future events are basically meaningless.  You can predict some events and they can occur, but you create the future in every moment.

Time, in your terms, is plastic.  Most predictions are made in a highly distorted fashion; they can lead the public astray.  Not only that, but when the predictors fall flat on their faces it does not help “The Cause”.  Reality does not exist in that fashion.  You can tune in to certain probabilities and predict “that they will occur”, but free will always operates.  No god in a giant ivory tower says, “This will happen February 15 ant 8:05”.  And if no god predicts, then I do not see the point of doing so myself.

(“What about precognitive dreams?”)

Some are entirely legitimate.  Often, however, the suggestion involved in a dream brings about the event, so it seems when the dream becomes real that you have looked into a future that already existed.  Instead you have formed the event, not realizing that it had its origins at the time you slept.  The question cannot be answered simply for there are many ramifications, but from this instant of reality you form and change not only the future, but the past.  In the operation of probabilities this has great significance, for this means that you change and affect all events, and that your books are a delightful fiction that tell you only your current ideas about the past.

(“How can I change my way of thinking to keep my family well, instead of making them sick?”)

Back here, we have a question from the gallery.  You must realize that you do not form events alone.  You are involved in a cooperative venture.  Usually then you alone are not responsible for an event, because others participate in its creation – for their own reasons.  The question cannot be answered simply in one evening, but each consciousness has its own defense system and its own vitality; you should trust your own.

You cooperate together to form the physical reality that you know, telepathically, through ways and means that are unknown to you.  You weave webs of psychic reality that then coalesce into physical reality.  You do not necessarily weave them alone, but together.  Your thoughts intertwine with those of others.  You are responsible for your own thoughts.  You need to learn the power of thought and emotion, but this should fill you with the joy of creativity.  Once you realize that your thoughts form reality, then you are no longer a slave to events.  You simply have to learn the methods.

(“But I don’t know how to learn them.”)

You will learn them here.  You will learn them through reading, and through listening to your inner self.  The methods have been known for centuries; not only centuries as you think of them, but for the lifetime of this earth as you know it, and even before – when the poles were reversed and when there were other stars in the sky and when the planets were not the planets that you know.

(“Where did you get the oregano, and in what form did you sniff it?”)

It was in the Indies and it was dry.

(One of the subjects discussed at break concerned the degree of “permanence” of the physical human form.)

In our own sessions I have explained something that I haven’t mentioned in class, and it is this: For every moment of time that you seem to exist in this universe, you do not exist in it.  The atoms and molecules have a pulsating nature that you do not usually perceive, so what seems to you to be a continuous atom or molecule is, instead, a series of pulsations that you cannot keep track of.

Physical matter is not permanent.  You only perceive it as continuous; your perceptive mechanisms are not equipped to detect the pulsations.  Now I am speaking to our friend over here (an engineer) because he may perhaps have a comprehension of what I am trying to explain, because of his background.

(“Are these pulses extremely fast in our terms?”)

They are indeed.  In certain conditions however, the inner self, abandoning its usual reliance upon the physical senses, is aware of these periods that would seem to you to be negations.

Your consciousness fluctuates in the same way.  It is here and then it is not here, but the physical self focuses upon only those moments of physical reality.  Because consciousness fluctuates however, other portions of your self have memory of those times when it is not focused in “physical reality”, and this is also a portion of your entire existence.

This isn’t half as complicated as it sounds.  Whether or not you remember your dreams, for example, a certain portion of you, under hypnosis, could remember every dream that you ever had in your life.  So a certain portion of you remembers those nonmoments when you are not focused in physical reality, when your existence is in another dimension of actuality entirely and you are perceiving what I will call, in your terms of reference, nonintervals.  I like the term nonintervals better than nonmoments.

(“Is this noninterval a moment of this existence?”)

It is indeed, in this existence; and also these nonintervals are moments in other dimensions of reality.

(“Might this be compared to the rotating light in a lighthouse?”)

It may, if you like the analogy.

(“Are there more than two pulses?”)

There are, and the whole self is aware of all of these realities.  With no unkindness meant, you all know yourselves and your weaknesses and failures, so why should you suppose that the self you know is the only self that you are?  Surely, it has occurred to you that you have abilities you are not using, that other realities connected with your innermost existence aren’t being expressed in the existence you know of.

I want you to think about the implications of what I have said concerning nonintervals.

(“Would a noninterval be a positive interval to another aspect of our existence?”)

It is, and they would not perceive your existence here, for to them it would be a noninterval.

(“Could this be the key to the simultaneous existence of all of our lives, the key to nontime?”)

Yes, indeed.  And some evening I will tell you that you should change your conception of the word “lives”.  This is the first hint I have given, either in our private sessions or in class, of some rather important material.  But think of what you mean when you use the word lives, and see how limited the term is.

I am going to end our session, but I have a comment.  I have said this before: Now if you understand that remark and think about it, you will understand much that is behind what I have said this evening.

(“Then we are as alive now as we have ever been?”)

That is correct – except that in the life in which you are now involved, you are not focusing upon the full potential of your vitality.

(“Was there a continent of Mu?”)

There was.  Now, I tell you to remember your dreams.  In your context I will tell you again not only to remember your dreams, but to learn to come awake in the middle of them and realize that you can manipulate within them.  You form them.  They are yours, not something thrust upon you in which you are powerless.

(“We are using our existence as the dream?”)

What I have said applies to what you just said.  In one context what you call physical reality is a dream, but in a larger context it is a dream that you have created.  When you realize that you form it you come into the memory of your whole self.

And when you realize that you form the events of your life in the same way, you will learn to take hold of your entire consciousness in whatever aspect it shows itself in this life.  Through all of this you must realize that you are not powerless.  Remember, also, that this life is a dimension of experience and reality even if it is, in contrast, a dream in a higher level of reality in which you have your larger consciousness.


2 comments:

  1. Now the question should have been was how many of us here are part of the Seth/Rubart entity. I bet his answer would have floored them.

    ReplyDelete
  2. True. I don't see entities as fixed things (like we tend to see our physical bodies and our physical lineage). They're more like frequencies (multidimensional of course) and all of us who have ever taken part in the saga of Gaia could have a "Seth entity" component. I suppose it's a bit like superposition in quantum mechanics. At one level I'm a "component" of "you" responding to "you".

    ReplyDelete