Seth Early Sessions, Vol 7, Session 290
Dream Images And Cellular Consciousness
I have a few comments to make concerning
the article on dreams, that you read in the paper.
Maturity has nothing to do with the meaning
of the reptiles and mammals mentioned as dream images. There is a generic imprint stamped within the
cells, and at various levels of cell consciousness. These are reactivated. The images do not represent maturity nor
immaturity, but are simply designations natural to a particular level of
cellular consciousness.
The difference noted in this respect
between the dreams of men and women are only differences apparent within your
own structure of civilization. In your
social framework women are afraid of reptiles, and they do not consciously
remember dreams involving these. Except
in strong nightmare situations, they repress those images. They remember the mammal dreams more easily
however because mammals are warm blooded creatures whose reproductive systems
bear similarities to your own.
Men repress many mammalian images in your
particular civilization, because they do not want to be reminded of the
female’s reproductive advantages. But
these apply to your social frameworks alone.
The level of sleep is the real indicator. The individual becomes aware of cellular
consciousness at certain sleep levels.
Cellular consciousness itself straddles, so
to speak, various levels of sleep activity.
Various aspects of it come to the forefront at definite times. This consciousness is constant, whether you
wake or sleep. It existed before the
ego’s formation, and in many cases exists after the ego’s organization is
altered. In sleep cellular consciousness
often intrudes into the dream process, appearing in the form of dream
images. Cellular consciousness is highly
codified in actuality, much more emotional than visual, and the visual dream
images are but translations of inner comprehensions.
The bird dreams are in this same
category. No generalizations can
completely answer these questions however, for despite them individuals,
regardless of their sex, will show great variations in the dream images that
they recall or forget entirely.
Children recall animal dreams more
frequently simply because they are closer to cellular consciousness to begin
with. Such dreams do carry the
individual out away from ego identity, and at the same time closer to an inner
identity that the ego usually attempts to deny.
Such dreams do not basically imply a return
to a distant past, for to the cells all things are present. This reality is a basic part of your present
existence, and simply represents a dimension of actuality that the ego cannot,
by its nature, admit.
Now, the future is also present in cellular
consciousness. The ego, again, simply
censors dreams from the cellular consciousness level when they deal with time
that is not yet physical in your terms.
Cellular consciousness is usually considered as simply a repository for
past knowledge having to do with personal or racial existence. Because of the spacious present however,
cellular consciousness also contains blueprints of the future.
One again, however, these are of course
blueprints of probabilities. As you
know, the past itself is constantly changed as your own attitude toward it
changes. Therefore you see, even dealing
with the past, cellular consciousness does not involve knowledge of a closed
and finished time of existence. Obviously
then, the future is also constantly changing.
Cellular consciousness mirrors these changes, you see.
The organism is the center of this
happening, then, the core. The ego
attempts to stand apart and observe, but in order to do so it narrows the available
field of perception. Once it has formed
its characteristics, it has already become too specialized to do more than
observe certain limited fields of activity.
It is of course itself observed by the inner ego, which has
managed to maintain its position securely within subjective reality, where it
has a wider though somewhat less intense viewpoint.
The inner ego sees and knows itself as a
part of this action or happening, and sees the entire identity existing in
various dimensions simultaneously. The
outer ego attempts to cut action short, and so its viewpoint is limited by its
own attempt. It perceives its birth and
its death, but not beyond its birth or its death.
Cellular consciousness is a part of
the consciousness of the inner ego or inner self. Very loosely speaking, cellular
consciousness is to the inner self what the subconscious is to the outer
ego. There are of course many
differences however.
Cellular consciousness is therefore
expansive.
The expansion is in all directions, so to
speak. We have not quite completely
explained the idea of traveling through intensities to you, simply because
words are inadequate. The idea of
traveling through intensities gives the result, in your system, of traveling
through time, as I have told you.
You know that this is distortive. You recognize elements from the past, since
your ego is familiar with them. You
accept them into the organization of your perception on a conscious level,
usually. The ego does not recognize
elements of the future when they do appear within dreams, and it does not
therefore admit them into perceptive patterns.
The ego does not perceive their significance. It is only for this reason that certain
events seem to be always in your future:
this lack of recognition, identification, acceptance and organization
into patterns that can be used and manipulated.
In your dreams, in other words, you are familiar
with images like the mammals and reptiles, that would seem not to belong to the
present. These however would seem
to belong to the future rather than to the past, and these you forget almost instantly,
as a rule. This does not mean that some individuals
do not recall them.
Even if they are recalled as dreams however,
they may appear meaningless, for they are unfamiliar to the ego. Yesterday’s events reenacted in a dream touch off
familiarity. Tomorrow’s events in tonight’s
dreams do not, not at least to the ego. Generic
codes apply in other words to the future as well as to the past, but mankind does
not generally perceive them as such for they appear meaningless to the ego, because
of the ego’s inherent nature and limitations.
Tonight’s material will take us even further
into a study of reality. Read the session
over well.
No comments:
Post a Comment