Seth's Early Sessions, Vol 6, Session 270
Inner Ego
… You are your subconscious self, and
oftentimes what makes no sense to the ego makes good sense to the overall
personality. Still, there are
psychological balances that always operate when the overall personality gestalt
is operating effectively …
The overall needs of the personality are
always taken into consideration by what I have called in the past the inner
ego. Now this portion of the self is
indeed self-conscious in the highest meaning of the term – aware of the
subconscious portion of the personality, aware of the primary conscious
framework that you call your ego, and constantly directs the overall
activities. This portion is aware of the
complicated workings of the nervous system and all bodily functions. It is the overseer. It knows when to allow subconscious needs and
wishes their fulfillment. It knows when
to put fulfillment off for a time. It is
this part of the personality that is in charge of overall stability.
Now.
This inner ego can also operate within the dream state, and in certain
awake-seeming dreams, it is the portion that realizes that the personality is
not in its normal waking condition. It
is this portion of the self that is with you in the most excellent
projections. The inner ego is the part
of the personality that contains the highest aspirations and capabilities. It has been called by psychologists the
subliminal self.
When in such dreams your perceptions
seem exceedingly clear, you can be certain that the inner ego is
operating. Now all portions of the
personality, of the present personality, belong to this inner ego. It functions constantly, and yet it is always
in a state of becoming. It is more
than what you are at any given moment in your time. It contains, and is, the psychological
blueprint containing the full potential of the present personality within any
given incarnation.
It is the director of all the subsidiary
psychological subpersonalities that form the acting-present primary
personality. It gives and takes. It prevents unconstructed aspects from
gaining control, unless of course there are strong reasons why such control is
necessary in the long run.
It dabbles in both your future and your
past, speaking now in your terms. As you
create a painting, and the painting is still an aspect of yourself, so it
creates the whole personality, which is an aspect of itself. It operates in both the waking and the dream
state. It often forms the content of
each. It is more knowledgeable than any
one aspect of the personality. It is
more knowledgeable than all other aspects of the personality, for it forms them
together into a cohesive whole.
It is therefore the director of all
activities, both in the waking and dream condition. It is the inner ego from whom you receive
your inspiration, and it is the inner ego which gives consent to our
meetings.
I told you from the beginning that the
inner ego is aware of data that is received through the inner senses as well as
data from the outer senses.
It is the prime identity of the whole
present personality. In many cases it is
the I of your dreams. It is definitely
the I of your creative activity. It is
the I, you see, which survives physical existence, and the physical,
physically-oriented ego is only a part of it.
If only the physically-oriented ego
survived, very little indeed would survive at all. The physically-oriented ego is hardly aware
of your experiences in their entirety.
The physically-oriented ego, if it alone survived, would contain only
your conscious memories. Even now, in
physical existence, you operate on a much deeper and more complicated level
than this. Events and experiences which
are forgotten, or which escaped the physically-oriented ego, still affect your
activities in this life, and if they did not your physical existence would be
brief indeed. Any survival that was
based upon the survival of the physically-oriented ego alone would be as
shallow as a paper cutout. These things
escape you. You take it for granted that
the physically-oriented ego represents your own psychological identity, you
see, and this is an illusion. It
contains a portion of your psychological feeling of identity, but only
that.
Feelings and sensations and memories that
it knows nothing of have built up your psychological identity, and given you a
sense of continuity. Of these this ego
knows but little. Intimacy with your
self and with your own identity, that is intimate knowledge of your own
identity, resides in all portions of the self, and is not dependent upon
a survival based upon the survival of the physically-oriented ego. This would represent a sham of a survival
indeed.
There is a basic difference you see between
a survival personality, and the personality as you know it. The individual in physical life shows his
surface face, so to speak, outward.
Inner psychological realities are hidden beneath the physically-oriented
ego simply because it cannot afford to deal with them. Its one main purpose is simply to allow the
personality to operate effectively within its physical environment.
The surviving personality has a
different psychological balance. The
outer ego no longer shows its outside face, so to speak, but takes its place
with the other aspects of the personality.
You might say that it becomes the subconscious, although I
am speaking now simply to get the idea across, and this is not precisely
the case.
It is true however to say that the memories
of the physically-oriented ego take their place with memories that were once
subconscious. I am speaking now of the
psychological makeup of the survival personality. The memories remain in physical existence. There is no real distinction between
psychological reality and physical reality.
The physically-oriented ego manufactures this distinction of necessity.
The survival personality does not need to do
this. To him all realities are psychological
realities, a thought as real as a chair – in fact, much more real. Therefore, communications between survival personalities
and physically-oriented personalities are bound to suffer difficulties, and these
difficulties are the result of the change in psychological frameworks.
No comments:
Post a Comment