Dreams, Evolution, Fulfillment Session 921
For our
psychology lesson, continued from before.
Communications
between various scattered portions of the self often appear, again, in such
situations as automatic writing, speaking, the hearing of voices, or through
what the person believes to be telepathic messages from others.
The supposedly
telepathic messages can be attributed to contemporaries – enemies, gods,
devils, or what have you. Spacemen are a
recent addition. In most cases, what you
have here are expressions of strong portions of the self that are more or less
purposefully kept in isolation. They may
appear or disappear, psychologically speaking.
They present a kind of chain of command – one that is not usually
permanent for any long period, however.
Particularly when
the voices or communications give orders to be obeyed, they represent powerful,
otherwise repressed, images and desires, strong enough to form about themselves
their own personifications. Some may
seem relatively genuine in terms of presenting a fairly well-rounded
representation of a normal personality.
That is a fairly rare occurrence, however. Usually you are presented with, say,
semi-personalities, or even with lesser versions – fragmentary expressions of
impulses and desires that are dramatically presented only in snatches, heard by
the person as a voice, or perceived as a presence.
In many
situations, the main personifications are instead of a ritual nature, taking
advantage of psychological patterns already present in the culture’s art or
religion or science. You end up with
Christs, spacemen, various saints or spirits, or other personality fabrications
whose characteristics and abilities are already known.
You have
schizophrenic models, in other words, and the particular model chosen in any
case, at any given time – for the models change – gives indications quite
clearly of the person’s basic problems and dilemmas. Such cultural models are present in society
to begin with, because in one way or another they express in an exaggerated
form certain portions of man’s psychological reality that he does not as yet
understand. This applies to the “good”
schizophrenic models and to the “bad” ones – that is, to the gods as well as to
the demons.
Such
“communications” with the gods or demons, St. Pauls or Hitlers, represent in
such instances dramatized, exaggerated personifications of the portion of the
personality that is at the head of the chain of command at the moment.
In the first
place, reality is primarily a mental phenomenon, in which the perceptions of
the senses are organized and put together in ways that perfectly “mimic” in
physical terms a primary nonphysical experience. This is tricky to express, because the
application of a psychological awareness through the auspices of the flesh
automatically makes certain transformations of data necessary.
Devils and demons
have no objective existence. They have
always represented, again, portions of mankind’s own psychological reality that
to some extent he had not assimilated – but in a schizophrenic kind of
expression, projected instead outward from himself. Therefore, it does not seem he must be held
accountable for acts that he considers debasing, or cruel. He isolates himself from that responsibility
by imagining the existence of other forces – the devils or demons of the nether
world.
On an individual
basis, the schizophrenic carries through those cultural patterns. The contrasts between say, the superior self
or the idealized self, and the debased self, may vary. They may be brilliantly apparent or somewhat
blurred. In many such instances, there
will also be at least a short spurt of intense but scrambled, perhaps
garbled, creative activity, in which the individual tries to recognize these
various elements, as mankind himself has attempted many times in the creative,
sometimes garbled creation of his own religions.
Here you can have
anything from banal rubbish to the most excellent creative product, but in the
schizophrenic framework it will be of brief duration, experienced outside of
the framework of usual day-to-day living, concentrated.
The Christ image
is often used because it so perfectly represents the combination of the grandiose
self, as per the all-knowing son of God, and the martyred victim who is
crucified precisely because of his lofty position.
The Christ figure
represents the exaggerated, idealized version of the inner self that the
individual feels incapable of living up to.
He feels he is being crucified by his own abilities. He may – or of course she may – on other
occasions receive messages from the devil, or demons, which on their part
represent the person’s feelings about the physical self that seems to be so
evil and contradictory in contrast to the idealized image. Again, there is great variety of behavior
here.
Such people,
however, in their fashion refuse to accept standardized versions of
reality. Even though they are so
uncertain of themselves that their psychological patterns do follow those of
culture, religion, science, or whatever, they try to use those patterns in
their own individual ways. They are
actually in the process of putting their own personalities together long after
most people have settled upon one official version or another – and so their
behavior gives glimpses of the ever-changing give-and-take among the various
elements of human personality.
Most of the
declared instances of telepathy or clairvoyance that happen in schizophrenic
situations are instead the individual’s attempts to prove to himself or herself
that the idealized qualities of omnipotence or power are indeed within grasp –
this, of course, to compensate for the basic feeling of powerlessness in more
ordinary endeavors. In some situations,
however, there are definite, quite valid instances of telepathy or
clairvoyance, vivid out-of-body experiences, and other excursions beyond the
officially accepted realm of reality.
These are often
complicated, however, since the individuals’ belief patterns are of such an
exaggerated blend to begin with, so that such episodes are usually accompanied
by phantom figures from religion or mythology.
The individuals may feel forced to have such experiences, simply because,
again, they do not want to face responsibility for action, for the reasons
given earlier.
In your terms of
time, man has always projected unassimilated psychological elements of his own
personality outward, but in much earlier times he did this using a
multitudinous variety of images, personifications, gods, goddesses, demons and
devils, good spirits and bad. Before the
Roman gods were fully formalized, there was a spectacular range of good and bad
deities, with all gradations [among them], that more or less “democratically”
represented the unknown but sensed, splendid and tumultuous characteristics of
the human soul, and have stood for those sensed but unknown glimpses of his own
reality that man was in one way or another determined to explore.
It was understood
that all of these “forces” had their parts to play in human events. Some stood for forces of nature that could
very well be at times advantageous, and at times disadvantageous – as, for
example, the god of storms might be very welcome at one time, in periods of
drought, while his powers might be quite dreaded if he overly satisfied his
people. There was no chasm of polarity
between the “good gods and the bad ones”.
Jehovah and the
Christian version of God brought about a direct conflict between the so-called forces
of good and the so-called forces of evil by largely cutting out all of the
intermediary gods, and therefore destroying the subtle psychological
give-and-take that occurred between them – among them – and polarizing man’s
own view of his inner psychological reality.
There were no
schizophrenics in the time of the pagans, for the belief systems did not
support that kind of interpretation.
This does not mean that certain behavior did not occur that you
would now call schizophrenic. It means
that generally speaking such behavior fit within the psychological
picture of reality. It [did so] because
many of the behavior patterns associated, now, with schizophrenia, are
“distorted and debased” remnants of behavior patterns that are part and parcel
of man’s heritage, and that harken back to activities and abilities that at one
time had precise social meaning, and served definite purposes.
These include
man’s ability to identify with the forces of nature, to project portions of his
own psychological reality outward from himself, and then to perceive those
portions in a revitalized transformation – a transformation that then indeed
can alter physical reality.
The next natural
step would be to reassimilate those portions of the self, to acknowledge
their ancient origins and abilities, to return them so that they form a new
coating, as it were, or a new version of selfhood. It is as if man could not understand
his own potentials unless he projected them outward into a godhead, where he
could see them in a kind of isolated pure form, recognize them for what they
are, and then accept them – the potentials – as part of his own psychological
reality. As a species, however, you have
not taken the last step. Your idea of
the devil represents the same kind of process, except that it stands for your
idea of evil or darkness, or abilities that you are afraid of. They also stand for elements of your own
potential. I am not speaking of evil
possibilities, but that man must realize that he is responsible for his acts,
whether they are called good or evil.
You make your own
reality, Man’s “evil” exists because of his misunderstanding of his own ideals,
because of the gap that seems to exist between the ideal and its actualization. Evil actions, in other words, are the result
of ignorance and misunderstanding. Evil
is not a force in itself.