Seth's Unknown Reality, Volume 2, Session 741
The unknown reality appears [to
be] invisible only because you do not accept it in your prime series of events.
It is as if you had trained
yourselves to respond to red lights and to ignore green ones, for example – or
as if you read only every third or fourth line on a page of a book.
You attend to matters that seem
to have practical value. Whether or not
you understand what space is, you move through it easily. You do not calculate how many steps it takes
you to cross a room, for instance. You
do not need to understand the properties of space in scientific terms, in order
to use it very well. You can see
yourselves operate in space, however; to that extent it is a known quality,
apparent to the senses. Your practical
locomotion is involved with it so you recognize it. Its mysterious or less-known properties
scarcely concern you.
Now, you move through
probabilities in much the same way that you navigate in space. As you do not consciously bother with all of
the calculations necessary in the process of walking down the street, so you
also ignore the mechanisms that involve motion through probable realities. You manipulate through probabilities so
smoothly, in fact, and with such finesse, that you seldom catch yourself in the
act of changing your course from one probability to another.
Take a very simple action: You stand at a corner, wondering which
direction to take. There are four
streets involved. You briefly consider
streets One and Two, but rather quickly decide against them. You stand for a moment longer, gazing down
Street Three, taking in the visual area.
You are somewhat attracted, and imagine yourself taking that course. Your imagination places you there
momentarily. Inner data is immediately
aroused through conscious and unconscious associations. Perhaps you are aware of a few memories that
dimly come to mind. One house might
remind you of one a relative lived in years ago. A tree might be reminiscent of one that grew
by your family home. But in that
instant, inner computations occur as you consider making a fairly simple
decision, and the immediate area is checked against all portions of your
knowledge.
You then look at Street
Four. The same process happens
again. This area also takes your
attention. At the same time you almost
equally hold in your mind the image of Street Three, for you can see them both
at once from this intersection.
Let us say that you are almost
equally attracted to both courses. You
teeter between probabilities, having the full power to choose once
street or the other as physical experience.
If you had to stand there and write down all the thoughts and
associations connected with each course of action before you made your
decision, you might never cross the intersection to begin with. You might be hit by an automobile as you
stood there, lost in your musings.
In the same way, it would take
you some time to even walk from a table to a chair if you had to be consciously
aware of all of the nerves and muscles that must first be activated. But while you stand almost equally attracted
by streets Three and Four, then you send out mental and psychic energy in those
directions.
Past associations merge with
present reality and form a pattern.
Mentally, a part of you actually starts out upon each street – a
projected mental image. As you stand
there, then, in this case two such projected images go out onto streets Three
and Four. To some extent these images
experience “what will happen” if you yourself take one direction or the
other. That information is returned to
you instantaneously, and you make your decision accordingly. Say you choose Street Four. Physically you begin to walk in that
direction. Street Four becomes your
physical reality. You accept that
experience in your prime sequence of events.
You have, however, already sent out an energized mental image of
yourself into Street Three, and you cannot withdraw that energy.
The portion of you that was
attracted to that route continues to travel it.
At that point of decision this alternate self made a different
conclusion: that it experience Street Three as physical reality. The self as you think of it is literally
reborn in each instant, following an infinite number of events from the one
official series of events that you recognize at any given “time”.
There is something highly
important here concerning your technological civilization: As your world becomes more complicated, in those
terms, you increase the number of probable actions practically
available. The number of decisions
multiplies. You can physically move from
one place on the planet to another with relative ease. Centuries ago, ordinary people did not have
the opportunity to travel from one country to another with such rapidity. As space becomes “smaller”, your
probabilities grow in complexity. Your
consciousness handles far more space data now.
(I am speaking in your terms of time.)
Watching television, you are aware of events that occur on the other
side of the earth, so your consciousness necessarily becomes less
parochial. As this has happened the
whole matter of probabilities has begun to assume a more practical
cast. Civilizations are locked one into
the other. Politicians try to predict
what other governments will do. Ordinary
people try to predict what their government might do.
More and more, you are beginning
to deal with probabilities as you try to ascertain which of a number of
probable events might physically occur.
When the question of probabilities is a practical one, then scientists
give it more consideration.
The entire subject is very
important however. As far as a true
psychology is concerned, individuals who are made aware of the existence of
probable realities will no longer feel trapped by events. You consciousness is at a point where it is
beginning to understand the significance of “predictive action” – and
predictive action always involves probabilities.
In certain terms, you are
the recognized “result” of all of the decisions you have made up to this point
in your life. That is the official
you. You are in no way diminished
because other quite-as-official selves are “offshoots” of your own experience,
making the choices you did not make, and choosing then, alternate versions of
reality.
You follow the prime series of
events that you recognize as your own, yet all of you are connected. These are not just esoteric statements, but
valid clues about the nature of your own behavior, meant to give you a sense of
your own freedom, and to emphasize the importance of your choice.
Whenever you try to predict
behavior or events, then, you are dealing with probabilities.
However, it seems to you that all
action in the past is fixed and done, while behavior in the future alone is
open to change – so the word “prediction” assumes future action. Basically, the past is as open to change as
the future is. When you are dealing with
historic events you believe that no prediction is involved. Personally and as a species, you are
convinced that there is a one-line series of finished events behind you.
In The Nature of Personal Reality I stated that the point of action
occurs in the present moment. In Adventures in Consciousness Ruburt said,
quite properly, that time experience actually splashed out from the present to
form an apparent past and future.
When you seemingly look backward
into time, and construct a history, you do so by projecting your own prime
series of events into the past as it is understood. Obviously you read the past from the present,
but you also create it from the present as well. You accept certain data – your present
recognized series of events – then use that series as a measuring stick, so to
speak: It automatically rejects what does not fit. At certain levels of experience this makes
little difference. All data agree. No rough spots show.
You build smooth structures of
beliefs, then look at reality using the beliefs like glasses – tinted
ones. Opposing information will literally
be invisible to you. It will be ignored
or cast aside.
It has been fashionable to think
in terms of straight-line evolution, for example. As mentioned earlier in this book, the
accepted theory of evolution is highly simplistic. Your species did not come from one particular
source. You have many cousins, so to
speak. Some traces of that lineage
remain in your time. However, when you
look “backward” at the planet you actually try to predict past behavior from
the standpoint of the present.
You do this personally in your
intimate lives to some degree also, as you view your earlier days. You blot out events that do not fit your present
concept of yourself. They literally
become nonexistent as far as you are concerned.
In such fashion you block out aspects of your own reality – and consciously,
at least, cut down on your choices.
The species as you know it has
within it, intrinsically, many abilities and characteristics that go
unrecognized because you do not accept them as a part of your biological or
spiritual heritage. Therefore they
become latent and invisible, practically speaking. The same applies individually, when you deny
yourselves the rich mixture of consciousness and experience that is available
through a recognition of the manipulation of probable realities.
You alter your experience in each
instant, quite drastically. Each
individual possess far vaster opportunities for choice than are realized. You are denied tomorrow’s wisdom only because
you believe time is a closed system. It
is true that you are subject to birth and death, yet within that framework far
greater dimensions of experience are possible than are usually experienced.
You are all counterparts
of each other who are alive at any given earth time. By really understanding this you could come
to terms with the ideas of brotherhood that religions have taught for so long.
No comments:
Post a Comment