Personal Reality, Session 648
There are too
many aspects of what you think of as health and illness to discuss even in a
book that is directed to personal reality, in which the body plays such
an important role.
Health and
illness are both evidences of the body’s attempt to maintain stability. There is a difference in the overall health
patterns in men and animals because of the quite diverse nature of their
physical experience. More will be said
about this particular subject later.
Overall, however, in the animals, illness and disease play a life-giving
role, keeping balance both within a species and between them, therefore
insuring the future existence of all involved.
In their own
ways, the animals are quite aware of this fact.
Some of them even bring themselves to their own destruction through what
you would call suicide, and en masse. At
that level the animals understand, and are always in touch with deep biological
connections in which they know their own continuances within the chain of
nature.
Man grants rich
psychological activity to his own species but denies it in others. There are as many luxuriant and diverse kinds
of psychological movement as there are species, however. The cycles of health and disease are felt as
rhythms of the body by the large variety of animals, and even with them illness
or disease has life-saving qualities on another level.
Instinct is
fairly accurate, for example, guiding the beasts to those territories in which
proper conditions can be found; and even for them the well-being of the body
represents physical evidence of their “being in the proper place at the proper
time”. It reinforces the animals’ sense
of grace, in terms mentioned earlier in the book. (See
the 636th session in Chapter Nine.)
They understand
the beneficial teaching quality of disease, and follow their own instinctive
ways of treating it. In a natural
situation, this might involve a mass migration from one territory to another. In such cases the illness of only a few
animals might send a whole herd to its safety, and a new food supply.
Man is so highly
verbal that he finds it difficult to understand that other species work with
idea-complexes of a different kind, in which of course thought as you
consider it is not involved. But an
equivalent exists; using an analogy, it is as if ideas are built up not through
sentence structure reinforced by inner visual images, but by like “mental”
patterns structured through touch and scent – in other words, thinking, but
within a framework entirely different and alien to you.
Such “thinking”
exists, using the analogy, within the framework of instinct, whereas your own
verbalized thoughts can also intrude outside of that framework. One of the main differences between you and
the animals, and one of the significant meanings in terms of free will, is
involved here.
Animals, then,
understand the beneficial directing elements of disease. They also comprehend the nature of stress as
a necessary stimulant to physical activity.
Observing even a pet, you will notice its marvelous complete relaxation,
and yet its immediate total response to stimulus. So animals in captivity will fight to provide
themselves with necessary health-giving stress factors.
Animals, then,
do not think of illness in terms of good or bad. Disease in itself on that level is a
part of the life-survival process, and a system of checks and balances. With the emergence of man’s particular kind
of consciousness, other issues become involved.
Mankind feels its own mortality even more than the beasts do.
With the growth
of this particular variety of self-consciousness came the exteriorization,
magnification and intensification of definite elements that lie latent in other
animals, the individuation of strong emotional activity to a new degree, for
example. The emergence of the “pause of
reflection” mentioned earlier (in the 635th session in Chapter
Eight, for instance) and the blossoming of memory along with the emotional
intensification, led to a situation in which members of the new species
recalled, in the present, the dead and the diseases that killed them. They became frightened of disease,
particularly in the case of plagues.
Man forgot the
teaching and healing elements, and concentrated instead upon the
unpleasant experience itself. To some
extent this was quite natural, for the new species developed in order to change
the nature of its consciousness, to follow a reality in which instinct was no
longer “blindly” followed, and to individualize in strong personal focus
corporeal experience that had previously taken a different pattern.
Man has a far
greater leeway. He forms his reality
according to his conscious beliefs, even while its basis lies in the deep
unconscious nature of the earth in corporeal terms. Man’s “I am”, [seemingly] apart from nature –
a characteristic necessary for the development of his kind of consciousness –
led him into value judgments, and also necessitated some break with the deep
inner certainties of other species.
Illness
therefore was experienced as “bad”. An
entire tribe could be endangered by one sick member. At the same time, as the mind developed,
cunning and memory became highly effective survival tools. In some societies or tribes, the old or
infirm were killed lest their care take too much attention from the able-bodied
and endanger the group.
In others,
however, the old were honored for the wisdom that they had accumulated with
age, and this became very practical in tribes where many did not survive. History was dependent upon the old with their
memory of past events, and the group’s sense of continuity was also in the
hands of its oldest members, who passed memories on to others.
An individual
who had himself survived many diseases was considered a sage. Such people often watched the animals and
observed nature’s own therapies and treatments.
In certain eras,
the lines between the species were not completely drawn, and there were long
periods where men and animals mixed and learned from each other. Man’s imagination made him a great maker of
myths. Myths as you know them represent
bridges of psychological activity, and point quite clearly to patterns of
perception and behavior through which, in your terms, the race passed as it
traveled to its present state. Mythology
bridges the gap between instinctive knowledge and the individualization of
idea.
When an animal
is sick it immediately begins to remedy the situation, and unconsciously it
knows what to do. It does not bother
thinking in your terms of good and evil.
It does not wonder what it did to get into such a situation. It does not think of itself as inferior. It automatically begins its own therapy.
A human being,
however, has another dimension to deal with, a new area of creativity, a
diverse mixture of beliefs. His or her ideas
about the self must be examined, for they are being materialized in flesh. Again, the situation has great complexity, for
the condition is still a healthy attempt on the part of the body to
maintain balance. Overall there is also
the world situation to be taken into consideration – the status of the species
on the planet, in which, say, overpopulation problems will bring about death to
insure new growth.
The individuals
alive at such a time will also have a hand in such decisions, however. Once more, because you are self-conscious
beings your beliefs regulate your reality.
An animal knows unconsciously that it is unique and has a place in the
scheme of being. Its sense of grace is
built-in. Your free will allows for the
freedom of any belief, including one that says you are unworthy, with no right
to your existence.
If you
misinterpret the myths, then you may believe that man has fallen from grace and
that his very creaturehood is cursed, in which case you will not trust your
body or allow it its “natural” pattern of self-therapy.
In order for
consciousness to develop in your terms, there must be freedom for the
exploration of all ideas individually and en masse. Each of you are living entities,
growing toward your own development. Each
of your beliefs, therefore, has its own unique origin and feeling patterns, so
you must for yourself travel back through your beliefs and your own
feelings until intellectually and emotionally you realize your rightness, your
completely original existence in time and space as you know it.
This knowing will
give you the conscious knowledge that is a counterpart of the animal’s
unconscious comprehension.
An animal has no
need of conscience, in any terms.
Because of the
great flexibility of your natures, however, mankind needs a framework in which
the ramifications of what I have referred to as normal healthy guilt can be
considered.
What you
consider conscience is often an applied-from-without sense of right and wrong
instilled in you in your youth. As a
rule these ideas represent your parents’ conceptions of natural guilt,
distorted by their own beliefs. (See the 619th session in Chapter
Four, as well as the first session in this chapter.) You accepted these ideas for a reason,
individually and en masse, for mankind at any given “time” has a strong idea of
the particular sort of world experience it will create.
Because you have
free will you have the responsibility and the gift, the joy and the necessity,
of working with your beliefs and of choosing your personal reality as you
desire. I told you earlier (in the 636th session in Chapter
Nine) that you cannot fall out of a state of grace. Each of you must intellectually and
emotionally accept it, however.
While this may
seem like the sheerest Pollyanna, nevertheless there is no evil in basic
terms. This does not mean that you
do not meet with effects that appear evil, but as you each move individually through
the dimensions of your own consciousness, you will understand that all seeming
opposites are other faces of the one supreme drive toward creativity.
(Aside, concerning the migration of geese: Their migration is perfect in its simplicity
and complexity, yet your journey as a species is far less predictable, opening
avenues of probabilities in which your consciousness and free will allows you
to become conscious creators in worlds that you initiate and then inhabit.)